Sensory feedback and coordinating asymmetrical landing in toads
Data files
May 05, 2016 version files 92.32 MB
-
AllRollData-3-30 Nov 2015.csv
60.51 KB
-
emgdataInt28 Nov 2015.mat
84.89 MB
-
MuscleDataRoll.csv
158 B
-
ReadCSVsTrig.m
9.90 KB
-
README_for_AllRollData-3-30 Nov 2015.docx
88.12 KB
-
README_for_emgdataInt28 Nov 2015.docx
88.12 KB
-
README_for_RollCSVTrigdata10 Mar 2016.docx
88.12 KB
-
Roll2.Rmd
28.37 KB
-
RollCSVTrigdata10 Mar 2016.mat
6.97 MB
-
ViewData6.m
101.63 KB
Abstract
Coordinated landing requires anticipating the timing and magnitude of impact, which in turn requires sensory input. To better understand how cane toads, well known for coordinated landing, prioritize visual versus vestibular feedback during hopping, we recorded forelimb joint angle patterns and electromyographic data from five animals hopping under two conditions that were designed to force animals to land with one forelimb well before the other. In one condition, landing asymmetry was due to mid-air rolling, created by an unstable takeoff surface. In this condition, visual, vestibular and proprioceptive information could be used to predict asymmetric landing. In the other, animals took off normally, but landed asymmetrically because of a sloped landing surface. In this condition, sensory feedback provided conflicting information, and only visual feedback could appropriately predict the asymmetrical landing. During the roll treatment, when all sensory feedback could be used to predict an asymmetrical landing, pre-landing forelimb muscle activity and movement began earlier in the limb that landed first. However, no such asymmetries in forelimb preparation were apparent during hops onto sloped landings when only visual information could be used to predict landing asymmetry. These data suggest that toads prioritize vestibular or proprioceptive information over visual feedback to coordinate landing.