Data for: Understanding post-fire vegetation recovery in Southern California ecosystems with the aid of pre-fire observations from long term monitoring
Data files
Oct 07, 2024 version files 1.45 MB
-
FireMeta.csv
1.94 KB
-
LATLONG.csv
4.62 KB
-
Plotmeta.csv
35.93 KB
-
quad_spwide.csv
940.78 KB
-
README.md
9.86 KB
-
SpeciesInfo.csv
26.21 KB
-
spWide.csv
434.70 KB
Abstract
Aims
Post-fire vegetation recovery is often determined by the similarity of post-burn with unburned sites due to a lack of in situ information on pre-fire communities. The inclusion of pre-fire data can help account for pre-existing differences and explore recovery also in terms of return to pre-fire conditions. We used long-term monitoring data in coastal sage scrub and grasslands to: (1) examine vegetation cover recovery of different functional groups and (2) determine whether vegetation composition in burned areas has recovered in four years after fire with burned to unburned and pre- to post-fire comparisons.
Location
Orange County, California, USA
Methods
We analyzed long-term vegetation monitoring (2007-2021) data from 39 grassland and 58 coastal sage scrub transects in southern California, including observations before and after the 2017 Canyon 2 fire. Linear mixed effect models were used to determine whether forb, grass, and shrub covers differed between burned and unburned sites while considering the effects of year and repeated monitoring. We used Canonical Analysis of Principal coordinates (CAP) to analyze vegetation composition based on burn status and time of sampling.
Results
While vegetation cover in grassland recovered quickly, native vegetation cover in burned coastal sage scrub remained lowered four years after fire, though forb and non-native grass cover were higher in some post-fire years. Community composition in burned coastal sage scrub was still in recovery four years after fire when compared with unburned or pre-fire composition. Although burned and unburned grassland differed post-fire in dominant grass species, inclusion of pre-fire data showed that this was a pre-existing difference.
Conclusions
Coastal sage scrub had not recovered pre-fire vegetation cover and composition by four years after fire, while grassland cover rebounded quickly, albeit with shifts in composition over time; patterns that were detected only by having pre- and post-fire data from long-term monitoring efforts.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rjdfn2zn3
Description of the data and file structure
The dataset contains long term (2007-2021) vegetation monitoring data from sites located around Orange county, and accompanying metadata, including whether sites were burned in recent wildfires. Each site is a 50m long linear transect, and vegetation data was collected via two methods (1) point-intercept on 1m spaced points, used for vegetation cover and community composition analyses, and (2) visual estimations of vegetation cover in 1x1m quadrats, spaced 5m apart, and alternating left and right of the transect line, used for diversity analyses.
Files and variables
File: SpeciesInfo.csv
Contains information about vegetation species found in the dataset
*N/As indicate instances of unknown or not applicable categorizations for the variable type corresponding to the species code.
Variable | Definition | Notes |
---|---|---|
spCode | Species code | Shortened codes representing the species name in spName |
spName | Species name | Full species name |
gHabit | Growth habit | Forb, Shrub, Grass |
Categorization2 | Combined variable of native status and growth habit | Concatenated strings of Native or NN_ (non-native) + growth habit type, Standing_Dead = dead plant matter |
Nat_Non | Natvie status | NATIVE = native species, NONNATIVE = non-native species |
covertype | Cover type | Plant = type of vegetation cover, Gcover = type of ground cover |
File: FireMeta.csv
Contains information about transects and their burn status from recent fires in the region
Variable | Definition | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transect | Full transect names | |
Santiago | Whether site was located within the 2007 Santiago fire perimeter | N = no, Y = yes |
Canyon2Fire | Whether site was located within the 2017 Canyon 2 Fire perimeter | N = no, Y = yes |
Silverado | Whether site was located within the 2020 Silverado/Bond fire perimeters | N = no, Y = yes |
File: Plotmeta.csv
Variable | Definition | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transect_Year | Transect name concatenated with year of particular datapoint | Final four numeric digits designate year |
Transect | Transect name | |
Community | Type of vegetation community. Only coastal sage scrub and grassland was included in our study. | CSS = Coastal Sage Scrub, GL = Grassland, CHAP = chapparal |
Region | Inland or coastal orange county. Only inland sites were used in our study. | Inland = inland, Coastal = coastal |
Year | Year this Transect_Year data point was taken | |
JM_ppt | Total precipitation (inches) from the preceding June- current year March |
File: LATLONG.csv
Variable | Definition | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transect | Full transect names | Section of transect names are not broken up with underscores, unlike in all other files. Transect name structure is as follows: OC_name of sub location_community type (CSS, GL, CHAP)_number |
Latitude | ||
Longitude | ||
Position | Whether site was in the more inland or coastal regions of Orange county | Coastal = coastal, Inland = inland |
File: quad_spwide.csv
Contains vegetation data from quadrat method
Variable | Definition | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transect_Year | Transect name concatenated with year of particular datapoint | Final four numeric digits designate year |
Other columns = Species codes indicating individual vegetation species. Refer to SpeciesInfo file | Average cover of vegetation species across all 1x1m quadrats spaced 5m apart, alternating left and right of 50m linear transect line | Columns which end with spp indicate vegetation that could only be identified to genus level. “UNK” species were unable to be identified in field, but could still be included in diversity calculations |
File: spWide.csv
Contains vegetation data from point-intercept method
Variable | Definition | Notes |
---|---|---|
Transect_Year | Transect name concatenated with year of particular datapoint | Final four numeric digits designate year |
Other columns = Species codes indicating individual vegetation species. Refer to SpeciesInfo file | Cover of vegetation species, generated by a point-intercept method with 1m points across the 50m linear transect line | Columns which end with spp indicate vegetation that could only be identified to genus level |
Code/software
Data is stored in .csv format, and can be read using widespread spreadsheet programs and text editors such as Microsoft Excel and Google Sheets.
This data was collected from coastal sage scrub and grassland transects across Orange County, California, between 2007-2021. It includes monitoring that took place both before and after a wildfire in 2017. Intercept data was generated using a point-intercept method every 1m along a linear 50m transect line, while quadrat data was generated from visual estimations of vegetation cover in1x1m quadrats spaced every 5m, alternating left and right, along the 50m transect line.