Skip to main content
Dryad

Suboptimal is good enough: Aligning thermal sensitivity to habitat temperature across season

Data files

Nov 10, 2025 version files 2.29 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Predicting organismal performance in changing environments is a global challenge. In ectotherms, organismal performance depends on how well-aligned the thermal sensitivities of fitness components are to body temperatures in natural habitat. It is frequently assumed that Topt (temperatures that maximize performance) for important fitness components have evolved to align with habitat temperatures. However, most organisms at temperate latitudes experience significant seasonal temperature variation, and therefore frequently operate at suboptimal temperatures. Importantly, seasonal performance patterns may differ among fitness components if those components have different thermal sensitivities.  The extent to which habitat temperature can deviate from Topt before an organism can no longer persist in its environment, and the role of seasonality in driving this deviation, are infrequently explored. Here, we assess how well-aligned the thermal sensitivity (thermal performance curves, or TPCs) of development, growth, and survival are to local habitat temperatures across two seasons using embryos of the marine gastropod Haminoea vesicula. We develop a mechanistic model by integrating thermal sensitivity for development, growth, and survival with habitat temperatures to predict embryo performance across seasons. Our results demonstrate that habitat temperatures mostly fall far below Topt for development and growth. Accordingly, in the cool spring, developmental periods are 20% longer and hatchling sizes are slightly (about 1%) smaller on average than in the summer. Survival risk intensifies in the summer due to an acute high-temperature event, indicating that seasonal temperature variation affects performance differently between fitness components. We horizontally shift TPC functions to assess how well-aligned the thermal sensitivity of each fitness component is to habitat temperatures. Simulations indicate that Topt for survival is well-aligned to habitat temperature, but Topt for development and growth would need to cold-shift by 11° and 16° C, respectively, to achieve optimal performance. However, cold-shifting TPCs to maximize development and growth results in sharp survival reductions due to summer heat spikes. Overall, Topt greatly exceed the most frequent habitat temperatures, leading to suboptimal performance most of the time. However, high Topt allow embryos to survive seasonally driven heat spikes. Sometimes “suboptimal” is good enough.