Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kyogoku, Daisuke
dc.contributor.author Kataoka, Yutaro
dc.contributor.author Kondoh, Michio
dc.contributor.author Kyogoku, Daisuke
dc.coverage.spatial Japan
dc.coverage.temporal Holocene
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-13T15:56:44Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-13T15:56:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019-08-05
dc.identifier doi:10.5061/dryad.50q9k64
dc.identifier.citation Kyogoku D, Kataoka Y, Kondoh M (2019) Who determines the timing of inflorescence closure of a sexual dandelion? Pollen donors versus recipients. Evolutionary Ecology.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.223745
dc.description Male-male competition for mating or fertilization opportunities may in theory select for male manipulative adaptation that can harm males’ mates, leading to sexual conflict. Evolutionary theory predicts that selection will favor the manipulation by pollen of the duration of its recipients’ receptivity. However, there is insufficient evidence to show that pollen can exert effects on the duration of receptivity, a prerequisite for the evolution of pollen manipulative adaptation. Using a sexual diploid dandelion, Taraxacum japonicum, we conducted hand pollination experiments within and between populations to examine the effects of pollen on the timing of inflorescence (flower head) closure. We also examined the potential fitness consequences to the pollen recipients by field observation of seed production in populations with different inflorescence closure timing. Within-population experiments showed that pollination induced inflorescence closure even when some of the florets in the inflorescence were not yet pollinated with compatible pollen. Furthermore, between-population crosses revealed that pollen donors, recipients, and their interaction all influenced the timing of inflorescence closure. Different populations differed in the timing of inflorescence closure, which could affect the availability to the recipients of pollen for fertilization and thereby seed production. However, there were no significant differences in the rates of natural seed production in these populations. Our results demonstrate that pollen donors, as well as recipients, contribute to the duration of floral receptivity, confirming that a prerequisite for sexually antagonistic adaptation is satisfied and suggesting manipulative adaptation of pollen or its donor. We discuss the implications of our findings to the evolutionary theory of plant reproduction.
dc.relation.haspart doi:10.5061/dryad.50q9k64/1
dc.relation.isreferencedby doi:10.1007/s10682-019-10000-9
dc.subject dandelion
dc.subject pollen competition
dc.subject sexual conflict
dc.subject sexual selection
dc.subject Taraxacum
dc.title Data from: Who determines the timing of inflorescence closure of a sexual dandelion?: Pollen donors vs. recipients
dc.type Article
dwc.ScientificName Taraxacum japonicum
dc.contributor.correspondingAuthor Daisuke Kyogoku
prism.publicationName Evolutionary Ecology

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title Kyogoku,Kataoka,Kondoh.2019.Evol.Ecol
Downloaded 2 times
Description Hand pollination experiment in the green house to observe the time from pollination to inflorescence closure, field hand pollination experiment to observe inflorescence closure induced by pollination, and the proportion of filled seeds in the field.
Download Kyogoku,Kataoka,Kondoh.2019.Evol.Ecol.xlsx (36.04 Kb)
Details View File Details

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: