Data from: Chemogenetic interrogation of a brain-wide fear memory network in mice
Data files
Mar 28, 2018 version files 396.85 KB
-
Cascading_failure_model.R
6.80 KB
-
DPM.R
4 KB
-
Figure_1A.csv
128.09 KB
-
Figure_1B.csv
22.10 KB
-
Figure_1C.csv
130.53 KB
-
Figure_1D.csv
16.52 KB
-
Figure_2A.csv
18.77 KB
-
Figure_2B.csv
69 B
-
Figure_2C.csv
2.11 KB
-
Figure_3B.csv
922 B
-
Figure_3C.csv
479 B
-
Figure_3D.csv
141 B
-
Figure_5B.csv
5.39 KB
-
Figure_6ABD.csv
771 B
-
Figure_6C.csv
541 B
-
Figure_S1ABC.csv
1.46 KB
-
Figure_S1D.csv
788 B
-
Figure_S1E.csv
23.86 KB
-
Figure_S1F.csv
15.46 KB
-
Figure_S1G.csv
746 B
-
Figure_S1H.csv
704 B
-
Figure_S1IJ.csv
1.06 KB
-
Figure_S1KL.csv
994 B
-
Figure_S3AC.csv
2.45 KB
-
Figure_S3BD.csv
4.02 KB
-
Figure_S3E.csv
45 B
-
Figure_S3F.csv
1 KB
-
Figure_S4AB.csv
2.49 KB
-
Figure_S4CD.csv
2.36 KB
-
Figure_S5A.csv
205 B
-
Figure_S5BCDEF.csv
869 B
-
Figure_S6A.csv
509 B
-
Figure_S6B.csv
605 B
Abstract
Behavior depends on coordinated activity across multiple brain regions. Within such networks, highly connected hub regions are assumed to disproportionately influence behavioral output, although this hypothesis has not been systematically evaluated. Previously, by mapping brain-wide expression of the activity-regulated gene c-fos, we identified a network of brain regions co-activated by fear memory. To test the hypothesis that hub regions are more important for network function, here, we simulated node deletion in silico in this behaviorally defined functional network. Removal of high degree nodes produced the greatest network disruption (e.g., reduction in global efficiency). To test these predictions in vivo, we examined the impact of post-training chemogenetic silencing of different network nodes on fear memory consolidation. In a series of independent experiments encompassing 25% of network nodes (i.e., 21/84 brain regions), we found that node degree accurately predicted observed deficits in memory consolidation, with silencing of highly connected hubs producing the largest impairments.