Geographic drivers more important than landscape composition in predicting bee beta diversity and community structure
Data files
Feb 19, 2024 version files 49.11 KB
-
Community_Data.csv
31.52 KB
-
README.md
1.20 KB
-
Site_Data.csv
16.38 KB
Feb 26, 2024 version files 49.08 KB
-
Community_Data.csv
31.52 KB
-
README.md
1.18 KB
-
Site_Data.csv
16.38 KB
Apr 27, 2024 version files 49.08 KB
-
Community_Data.csv
31.52 KB
-
README.md
1.17 KB
-
Site_Data.csv
16.38 KB
Abstract
The importance of microhabitat traits such as floral availability is well known; however, forest bee spatial dynamics have been variably studied across local to broad geographic scales. Past literature suggests that landscape factors from proximate to distal are important in determining forest bee community metrics, including richness, abundance, and taxonomic composition. Leveraging the interest and assistance of citizen science volunteers, we employed standard bee bowl trap transects across Maryland, Delaware, northern Virginia, and the District of Columbia and identified correlations between bee community composition, local and regional landcover, and broader geospatial patterns. We also identified the partial contributions of both specific species and sampling sites to total beta diversity. Various landcover metrics were significantly related to bee community structure, with bee abundance positively and negatively correlated with forest and wetland cover, respectively. In general, land cover metrics within a 1,000-m buffer exhibited stronger correlations with bee communities; however, broader geographic variation, using Cartesian coordinates north and east as indices, was most significantly correlated with the bee community. Specifically, bee communities were less rich to the east and south of the study area. We also identified similar correlations with the bee community as categorized both by trophic and nesting behaviors, with both geographic northing and easting proving to be most strongly correlated with the forest bee community. Results of beta diversity and cluster analyses showed that the most species-depauperate sites exhibited the highest contributions to beta diversity and that species-poor sites consisted of a reduced subset of the greater community. Our results show that successful bee conservation must consider, beyond local-scale resource availability, broad geospatial considerations and forest habitat connectivity across political and administrative boundaries.
README: Geographic drivers more important than landscape composition in predicting bee beta diversity and community structure
Ecosphere
Data were collected by citizen science volunteers using bee bowl transects across 99 forest sites in Maryland, Delaware, Washington, D.C., and northern Virginia, USA, in 2014. Characteristics of the forest bee community, including nesting and trophic groups, were correlated with landcover at varying spatial scales (200- and 1000-m buffer from transect origin) and broader biogeographic parameters.
Site_Data
Data table includes site name (Site), geographic coordinates in decimal degrees (Latitude, Longitude), the sampled State (State) and county (County), and geographic coordinates in meters north (Northing) and east (Easting) of UTM Zone 18 origin. Remaining variables include proportion of land cover types (open water, developed, forest, agriculture and early successional, wetlands) identified within 200- or 1000-m buffer of sampling transect origin.
Community_Data
Data table includes site name (Site) and community matrix with abundance counts of species collected at individual sites during the study period.
Methods
Data were collected by citizen science volunteers using bee bowl transects across 99 forest sites in Maryland, Delaware, Washington, D.C., and northern Virginia, USA, in 2014. Characteristics of the forest bee community, including nesting and trophic groups, were correlated with landcover at varying spatial scales (200- and 1000-m buffer from transect origin) and broader biogeographic parameters.