Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Memory-bound k-mer selection for large and evolutionary diverse reference libraries

Şapcı, Ali Osman Berk1; Mirarab, Siavash1

Research facility: University of California, San Diego
Published Sep 10, 2024 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.0000000c2

Data files

Abstract

Using k-mers to find sequence matches is increasingly used in many bioinformatic applications, including metagenomic sequence classification. The accuracy of these down-stream applications relies on the density of the reference databases, which, luckily, are rapidly growing. While the increased density provides hope for dramatic improvements in accuracy, scalability is a concern. Reference k-mers are kept in the memory during the query time, and saving all k-mers of these ever-expanding databases is fast becoming impractical. Several strategies for subsampling have been proposed, including minimizers and finding taxon-specific k-mers. However, we contend that these strategies are inadequate, especially when reference sets are taxonomically imbalanced, as are most microbial libraries. In this paper, we explore approaches for selecting a fixed-size subset of k-mers present in an ultra-large dataset to include in a library such that the classification of reads suffers the least. Our experiments demonstrate the limitations of existing approaches, especially for novel and poorly sampled groups. We propose a library construction algorithm called KRANK (K-mer RANKer) that combines several components, including a hierarchical selection strategy with adaptive size restrictions and an equitable coverage strategy. We implement KRANK in highly optimized code and combine it with the locality-sensitive-hashing classifier CONSULT-II to build a taxonomic classification and profiling method. On several benchmarks, KRANK k-mer selection dramatically reduces memory consumption with minimal loss in classification accuracy. We show in extensive analyses based on CAMI benchmarks that KRANK outperforms k-mer-based alternatives in terms of taxonomic profiling and comes close to the best marker-based methods in terms of accuracy.