Skip to main content
Dryad

The long shadow of the big lie: How beliefs about the legitimacy of the 2020 election spill over onto future elections

Levendusky, Matthew1; Patterson, Shawn1; Margolis, Michele1; Ophir, Yotam2; Walter, Dror3; Jamieson, Kathleen Hall1

Research facility: Annenberg Public Policy Center*
Published Apr 05, 2024 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.08kprr590

Data files

Apr 05, 2024 version files 25.51 MB

Abstract

Has the “big lie”—the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump—shaped citizens’ views of the legitimacy of other U.S. elections? We argue that it has. Those who believe Trump’s claim, whom we call election skeptics, lack confidence in elections for two inter-related reasons. First, because they think 2020 was inaccurately and unfairly conducted, they think that other elections will suffer a similar fate, and hence think these elections are illegitimate even before any votes are cast. Second, while all voters think elections are less legitimate when their preferred candidate loses, this effect will be especially large for election skeptics, because voter fraud gives them a mechanism to explain their candidates’ loss. Using an original panel dataset spanning the 2020 and 2022 elections, we show strong support for these hypotheses. This has important implications for our elections, and their legitimacy, moving forward.