Exotic success following disturbance explained by weak native resilience and ruderal exotic bias
Data files
Aug 24, 2023 version files 964.79 KB
Abstract
- Disturbance is a primary driver of exotic plant invasions, but why disturbance commonly favors exotics over natives is unresolved.
- To address this question, we conducted the first biogeographic study of disturbance across multiple plant species. We experimentally disturbed grasslands and added seeds of 34 plant species to plots in their native range and in two introduced ranges that differed in invasibility (susceptibility to invasion) to evaluate recruitment while examining potential influences of resource availability, native community recovery from disturbance (resilience), and life-history traits in local species pools.
- Species pools in the native (donor) range were more strongly skewed toward ruderal taxa than species pools in the introduced ranges. This bias in the donor pool was exacerbated by introduction filters that further selected for ruderal traits, strongly skewing exotic species pools in the introduced ranges toward ruderals. Sown species, which reflected these trait patterns, benefited from disturbance universally, but their disturbance response was 10-fold greater in the more invasible introduced range. This result was not explained by nutrient availability, which responded similarly to disturbance across ranges. Nor was it driven by background propagule pressure, which was minimal. Rather, the exaggerated disturbance effect in the more invasible introduced range appeared to be driven by weak recovery of the native plant community that allowed ruderal-biased exotics to proliferate.
- Overall, disturbance appeared to favored exotics because they were much more likely than natives to be ruderal. However, this trait bias only corresponded with an invader advantage in the more invasible range where weak community resilience was linked to slow-growing, stress-tolerant natives that failed to rapidly recover space and resources. In contrast, in the less invasible introduced range, highly competitive native perennials quickly filled the disturbance gap, demonstrating high community resilience that appeared to limit invader recruitment.
- Synthesis. Biogeographic influences on local species pools can facilitate invader success following disturbance, but final invasion outcomes are conditioned by native community resilience.
Methods
These data were collected in experimental plots using parallel methods in each of three regions representing either the native range (Turkey) or the introduced range (La Pampa, Argentina and Montana, USA) of 34 focal plant species. Treatments were seed addition of focal species (added or not) crossed with disturbance (disturbed or not). Plots were read in the first growing season after treatment for recruitment (number of seedlings per focal species) and for evaluation of community responses to disturbance (cover per species, including non-focal taxa, and species richness). Community responses to disturbance were assessed again in the second post-treatment year. See publication for sampling details.
Components of the dataset are:
RAW RECRUITMENT DATA - recruitment by individual focal species for both seeded and unseeded plots in the first growing season after treatment.
PLOT LEVEL RECRUITMENT DATA - Recruitment across focal species plus background community measures (non-focal species) for both seeded and unseeded plots in the first growing season after treatment.
COMMUNITY RESPONSE DATA - Community measures (including both focal and non-focal taxa) in unseeded plots prior to disturbance and in the first two post-treatment years.
Usage notes
The datafiles are Excel spreadsheets. Each includes a README tab that describes each data field/variable.