Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Differential use of nest materials and niche space among avian species within a single ecological community

Akresh, Michael1; Mandell, David1; Grima, Peter2; King, David3; Lauer, Kathryn1

Published Aug 06, 2024 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1jwstqk41

Data files

Aug 06, 2024 version files 75.26 KB

Abstract

Differential use of resources among bird species has been examined extensively in diet and nesting sites, but few studies have assessed this regarding avian nest materials. We assessed the structure and composition of nests in a group of coexisting passerine shrubland birds at a site in Massachusetts, USA. We found, measured, collected, and dissected nests, and then weighed nest materials in morphological groups (e.g., bark, twigs, feathers), to determine if our seven focal species were using different nest materials. Among species, we compared proportional material masses in complete nests, and also separately in the exterior, structural part of the nest and the interior, cup lining. We found that the proportional masses of all 17 material types that we examined in nests differed among species. The compositions of nests among all seven bird species were distinct in multivariate ordination space and only a few pairs of species had substantial niche overlap. Proportional masses of materials within discrete sections (exterior and interior) also varied among species. Although some differences in nest composition could be partially explained by bird species size, nest materials differed even within the three larger-bodied species and within four smaller-bodied species. Our study builds upon previous studies that have shown species-specificity in avian nest composition, and supports the notion that birds using the same environment have distinct niches in relation to the materials placed in their nests. Niche partitioning due to interspecific competition could partially explain our findings, as certain materials are limited as resources and searching for suitable nest materials is energetically costly. Additionally, other factors, such as phylogenetic relatedness and partitioned nest sites, may have led to differential nest material use. We recommend further research to help elucidate underlying mechanisms of nest composition partitioning in birds and potentially other nest-building taxa.