Grazing ecosystems ranging from the arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are: i) herbivore-driven nutrient cycling, ii) plant growth-water infiltration feedback under aridity, and iii) irreversible local herbivore-induced abiotic stress (topsoil erosion, salinity). However, these insufficiently explain the high temporal patch dynamics and wide-ranging distribution of grazing mosaics across productive habitats. Here we propose a fourth possibility where alternating patches are governed by the interplay of two important biotic processes: bioturbation by soil fauna that locally ameliorates soil conditions, promoting tall plant communities, alternating with biocompaction by large herbivores that locally impairs soil conditions, and promotes lawn communities. We review mechanisms that explain rapid conversions between bioturbation- and biocompaction-dominated patches, and provide a global map where this mechanism is possible. With a simple model we illustrate that this fourth mechanism expands the range of conditions under which grazing mosaics can persist. We conclude that the response of grazing systems to global change, as degradation or catastrophic droughts, will be contingent on the correct identification of the dominant process that drives their vegetation structural heterogeneity.
Howison et al 2017 Bioturbation Biocompaction
TITLE: Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
AUTHORS: Ruth A. Howison, Han Olff, Johan van de Koppel, and Christian Smit
Corresponding author: Ruth A. Howison (ruthhowison@gmail.com)
BifurcationModel.zip
Bifurcation model resulting in figures 2 and 3, designed and written by Johan van de Koppel and Ruth Howison, using R. R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Phase planes depicting the bifurcation analysis of simple plant-herbivore models, showing the more classical A) Herbivore-plant quality feedback, and B) Water-infiltration feedback.
Phase planes depicting the bifurcation analysis of plant-herbivore models with bioturbation, showing that the interplay between bioturbation and biocompaction strongly expands the conditions under which heterogeneity can persist in grazing ecosystems, with A) only bioturbation feedback and B) the consequence of combining bioturbation and biocompaction feedbacks."
GIS_Rainfall_Texture_Analysis.zip
Analysis by Ruth Howison and Han Olff, using ESRI ArcMap 10.3 for Desktop Global prediction of the regions where patchiness generated by bioturbation and biocompaction is possible, eliminating for unsuitable conditions, specifically certain soil characteristics and rainfall. Incompatible soils include; permafrost, sand (> 70% sand fraction and < 15% clay fraction), organic soil (histosols or > 20% organic material dry mass), and rainfall < 400 and > 1200 mm/yr and representing limits to forage quantity and quality required to maintain large herbivores.
Data sources used:
harmonized world soil database (HWSD) version 1.21, 2) Rainfall parameters were delineated using the global precipitation surface available from BioClim.org (Hijmans et al. 2005)