Invertebrate abundance sampled by benthic trawl and grab from common sites
Data files
Aug 10, 2023 version files 34.51 KB
-
grab_abundance.csv
-
grab_env.csv
-
README.md
-
trawl_abundance.csv
-
trawl_env.csv
Abstract
Aim: Long-term monitoring of offshore benthic communities provides data which are essential for effective marine management. Due to the expense and difficulty of sampling the seafloor comprehensively, monitoring is often limited to one sampling method targeting a specific community. In these cases, biological surrogacy is a useful monitoring approach and can be based on more easily sampled community diversity indices or assemblage patterns across the monitoring sites. This study aimed to quantify marine benthic invertebrate cross-community congruence and test surrogate effectiveness.
Location: Southern Benguela Shelf ecoregion on the west coast of South Africa.
Methods: We compared two benthic biological datasets collected from the same 24 sites: epifauna sampled by demersal research trawl and infauna sampled by grab. This study utilised co-correspondence analysis (CoCA) to test for congruence in assemblage patterns between communities and test community surrogacy.
Results: Significant linear relationships were found between epifauna and infauna species abundance, richness (d), and diversity (H’loge). Symmetric co-correspondence analysis (sCoCA) found the common variance captured by the first four axes to explain 40% and 24% of the total epifauna and infauna assemblage variation, respectively. Environmental gradients played a key role in structuring these similarities in broadscale biodiversity patterns. Predictive co-correspondence analysis (pCoCA) showed that epifauna assemblage structure did not significantly predict infauna assemblage structure, but infauna did predict 14% of the variation in epifauna assemblage structure.
Main conclusions: Epifauna and infauna communities were structured similarly but do not predict each other; community congruence does not imply effective surrogacy. These findings should be considered when including different benthic biological datasets into ecosystem classification and mapping, and provides a statistical framework for testing community congruence and surrogate effectiveness.
Methods
Benthic data collection
Biological data
The trawl samples were collected during 2011, 2012, 2017, 2019, and 2020. Research trawls were conducted using a 180 ft otter trawl with a 9 m sweep. The stretched mesh size of the codend is 60 mm and the stretched mesh size of the codend liner is 40 mm and the trawl was deployed for thirty minutes at each station. Once the net was brought aboard, the epifaunal invertebrates were retained and most specimens were identified to species level. The total weights and count for each species were recorded. The grab samples were collected during 2014, 2018, and 2021. Either a 0.1 m2 van Veen grab, 0.2 m2 van Veen grab, or a 0.25 m2 Day grab were used to sample the benthic macro-infauna. Samples were washed over a 1 mm mesh sieve to retain macrofauna greater than 1 mm in size. Specimens were later identified to the lowest taxonomic level (mostly species level), counted, and weighed.
Environmental data
Depth, latitude, and longitude were available for both trawl and grab datasets. CTD data were collected for each trawl and included bottom temperature, oxygen, and salinity. Sediment particle size analysis was done for the sediment samples collected from the grab samples. Sediment variables included percentage mud, very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, very coarse sand and gravel.
Usage notes
Microsoft Excel