Microbial responses to stress cryptically alter natural selection on plants
Data files
Mar 18, 2024 version files 113.34 KB
-
Bolin_Lau_NewPhyt_2024_data.csv
110.60 KB
-
README.md
2.74 KB
Abstract
Microbial communities can rapidly respond to stress, meaning plants may encounter altered soil microbial communities in stressful environments. Stress may therefore affect plant natural selection not only directly, but also indirectly via changes to the microbial community. Because stress can cause lasting changes to microbial communities, microbes may also cause legacy effects on plant selection that persist even after the stress ceases.
To explore microbial indirect and legacy effects, we grew plants in stressful (salt, herbicide, or herbivory) or non-stressful conditions with microbes that had experienced each of these environments in the previous generation.
Microbial indirect effects generally counteracted the direct effects of stress on plant selection, thereby weakening the strength of stress as a selective agent. Microbial legacy effects altered plant selection in non-stressful environments, suggesting that stress-induced changes to microbes may continue to affect selection after stress is lifted.
These results suggest that soil microbes may play a cryptic role in plant adaptation to stress, potentially reducing the strength of stress as a selective agent and altering the evolutionary trajectory of plant populations.
README: Microbial responses to stress cryptically alter natural selection on plants
For publication in New Phytologist (2024)
Please contact Lana Bolin (lanagbolin@gmail.com) with any questions
related to this data repository.
The authors ask that they be contacted before publishing work using the following datasets.
When using the following dataset please cite the original paper as well as the data repository.
This repository contains 1 data file.
Please see the methods section of Bolin and Lau (submitted for review at New Phytologist, 2023) for more details on how the following data were collected and analyzed.Files contained within this repository:
Bolin_Lau_NewPhyt_data.csv
This data file contains plant survival, biomass, flowering time,and specific leaf area measurements.##Variables
Pot.num: Unique identifier for each plant.
Flowering.date: Date when the first flower as fully open. Empty cell = plant did not flower.
ShootBiomass: Aboveground biomass in grams. Empty cell = plant did not produce biomass.
DeadHarvest: x = plant was dead when experiment was harvested. Empty
cell = plant was alive when experiment was harvested.
Mic.trt: Microbe history treatment describing the stress treatment
applied to plants in the field from which live microbial inoculum wastaken. "salt" = salt stress. "glyphosate" =
herbicide stress.
"herbivory" = herbivory stress. "control" = no stress.
GH.trt: Stress treatment applied in the glasshouse. "SALT" = salt
stress. "GLYPHOSATE" = herbicide stress. "HERBIVORY" = herbivory stress.
"CONTROL" = no stress.
FieldPlot: Numbered name of the field plot from which live microbial inoculum. There are 3 field plots per microbe
history ("Mic.trt").
Replant: x = plant did not survive original transplant and so was
replanted later. Empty cell = plant survived original transplant.
Family: Numbered name of the full-sibling family that a seed belongs to.
Leaflet.biomass: Mass of the two middle leaflets on the third fully expanded leaf on the main stem in milligrams.
Empty cell = leaflet biomass was not measured for this plant (leaflet biomass was only measured for certain
treatments)
Leaflet1.area: Area of the first of two collected leaflets in square centimeters.Empty cell = leaflet area was not
measured for this plant (leaflet area was only measured for certaintreatments)
Leaflet2.area: Area of the second of two collected leaflets in square centimeters.Empty cell = leaflet area was not
measured for this plant (leaflet area was only measured for certain treatments)
Leaflet.area.sum: Sum of "Leaflet1.area" and "Leaflet2.area".