Behavior of brown bears foraging on sockeye salmon in Lake Aleknagik, Alaska (foraging tactics and success)
Data files
Aug 15, 2024 version files 108.45 KB
-
Bozzi_et_al._Clean_Bear_Foraging_Analysis.R
12.45 KB
-
Bozzi_et_al._Updated_Complete_Bear_Data.csv
93.03 KB
-
README.md
2.97 KB
Abstract
Studies of foraging where focal animals are easily observed may miss common behaviours expressed under more cryptic conditions. For example, much of what is known about brown bears (Ursus arctos) foraging on Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) comes from a few anomalous locations where bears congregate, leaving open the question of how bears exploit salmon in the small streams where most predation occurs. Here, we used motion-activated video recordings to study the use and success of foraging tactics of Alaskan brown bears preying on sockeye salmon (O. nerka) in six small streams over three summers. We identified eight tactics from 387 independent foraging bouts and used multinomial models to explore drivers of their use and generalized linear models to examine factors influencing their success in capturing salmon. Cubs were far more likely to use sporadic foraging, a haphazard approach characterized by low success and high energy expenditure, than were adults, suggesting that this tactic may reflect inexperience. Tactics also varied with diel period and year. Foraging success was affected by tactic; notably, bears engaged in mixed and sporadic foraging were far less likely to catch a salmon than those using active tactics, whereas bears foraging passively were far more likely to catch a salmon than those foraging actively. Foraging success also varied among years but was not related to salmon abundance. These findings 1) showcase the diverse approaches brown bears use to exploit salmon in small streams, 2) add to our understanding of the ontogeny and success rates of foraging behaviours in habitats where most predation on salmon occurs, and 3) highlight the utility of video for overcoming challenges to the direct observation of bear behaviour.
README: Behavior of brown bears foraging on sockeye salmon in Lake Aleknagik, Alaska (foraging tactics and success)
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8sf7m0czc
Description of the data and file structure
Data were collected non-invasively using camera traps set to video mode to record foraging behavior or brown bears (targeting salmon). Recordings were watched to extract use of specific tactics, and success rates in capturing salmon of each tactic, as a function of age and sex.
Files and variables
File: Bozzi_et_al._Clean_Bear_Foraging_Analysis.R
Description: This file contains all of the R code used for the analysis, with instructions as to what all the variables and response in the two analyses (multinomial, negative binomial) were and the steps we took to complete them (so that repetition of both analyses should be straight forward).
File: Bozzi_et_al._Updated_Complete_Bear_Data.csv
Description: This is the full data file used as the basis for both analyses.
Variables
- Year: We collected data over 3 years (2016, 2021, 2022). In each year, data collection interval was mid-\ July through late August.
- Camera: We deployed 2 cameras per stream, so this variable indeitifes which camera it was on a stream that collected the video of a particular foraging bout.
- File Name: ID for each foraging bout (independent).
- Stream: We collected data on 6 streams: Happy, Hansen, Eagle, Yako, Bear, Whitefish
- Salmon Estimate: Salmon count for a particular stream in a particular year.
- Month Collected: July or August.
- Month: July or August.
- Day: Day of week on which video was recorded.
- Date: Calendar date on which video was recorded.
- lat: position lat
- lon: position long
- Time: Time of day when video was recorded
- Light Level: Suntime estimate (continuous measure of amount of darkness)
- Time of Day: Self explanatory.
- Age: Cub, Junveile, Adult
- Sex: Male/Female
- Adult Count: How many adults in video
- Subadult Count: How many sub-adults in video
- Cub Count: How many cubs in video
- Foraging?: Did the video include foraging?
- Tactic: Which tactic was observed in a video (of 8 options)
- Tactic (simplified): For the analysis, the subset of tactics included in the two analyses (e.g., scavenging was not included in the success analysis because scavenging is always successful).
- Multinom_tactics: Tactics included in the multinomial model (some were excluded because of too few observations; e.g., provisioning).
- ActiveVsMixed: For multinomial, active is the reference
- ActiveVsPassive: Active is the reference.
- ActiveVsScavenge: Active is the reference
- ActiveVsSporadic: Active is the reference
- Success?: Capture or not
- Outcome: Capture or not
- Comments:
Code/software
R code - included.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- N/A
Data was derived from the following sources:
- N/A
Methods
Data were collected using camera traps deployed along streams where sockeye salmon spawn during the summer (mid-July-late August), and set to video mode, in Bristol Bay, Alaska (Lake Aleknagik). Video was watched and extracted to record tactics use by, and success in capturing salmon (proportion of captures versus attempts) of, brown bears, categorized by age (cub, sub-adult, adult) and sex (female/male). One observed did all the categorizations and extractions (lead author Natalee Bozzi).
Data were analyzed statistically using multinomial models to identify drivers of use of different tactics (a total of 8), and negative binomial models to assess drivers of success in capturing salmon (including as a function of specific tactics).