1. Recent work suggests that savanna woody plant species separate into two different strategies based on their defences against herbivory; a low nutrient/high chemical defence strategy and a nutrition paired with mostly architectural defences strategy. The concept that chemical and structural defences can augment each other and do not necessarily trade-off has emanated from this work. In this study we examine woody plant defence strategies, how these respond to herbivore removal and how they affect plant growth in an East African savanna. 2. At three paired long-term exclosure sites with high browser and mixed feeder densities at Mpala Ranch, Kenya we investigated: a) whether defences employed by the dominant fine- and broad-leaved woody savanna species form defence strategies and if these align with previously proposed strategies, b) how nine key plant defence traits respond to herbivore removal and c) how effective the different defence strategies are at protecting against intense herbivory (by measuring plant growth with and without herbivores present). 3. We identified three defence strategies. We found a group (1) with high N, short spines and high N-free secondary metabolites, a group (2) with high N, long spines and low N-free secondary metabolites and a group (3) with moderate N, no spines and low N-free secondary metabolites (most likely defended by unmeasured chemical defences). Structural defences (spine length, branching) were generally found to be induced by herbivory, leaf available N increased or did not respond, and N-free secondary metabolites decreased or did not respond to herbivory. Species with long spines combined with increased ‘caginess’ (dense canopy architecture arising from complex arrangement of numerous woody and spiny axis categories) of branches maintained the highest growth under intense browsing, compared to species with short spines and high N-free secondary metabolites and species with no spines and low N-free secondary metabolites. Synthesis. At our study site, structural traits (i.e. spines, increased caginess) were the most inducible and effective defences against intense mammalian herbivory. We propose that high levels of variability in the way that nutrient and defence traits combine may contribute to the coexistence of closely related species comprising savanna woody communities.