Data from: Matching arthropod anatomy ontologies to the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology: results from a manual alignment
Data files
Jan 10, 2013 version files 6.38 MB
-
Appendix_A_Intersection_HAO_SPD_TADS.pdf
60.78 KB
-
Appendix_B_Intersection_HAO_TGMA_FBbt.pdf
227.70 KB
-
Appendix_C_Intersection_All.pdf
65.98 KB
-
Appendix_D_SPD_HAO_Manual_vs_LOOM.pdf
57.38 KB
-
Appendix_E_TGMA_HAO_Manual_vs_LOOM.pdf
171.81 KB
-
Appendix_F_FBbt_HAO_Manual_vs_LOOM.pdf
126.78 KB
-
Arthropod_Alignment_Cytoscape_Network.cys
249.57 KB
-
Arthropod_Alignment.obo
55.83 KB
-
FBbt.obo
2.36 MB
-
HAO vs FBbt (Drosophila).xls
312.83 KB
-
HAO vs SPD (spider).xls
52.22 KB
-
HAO vs TADS (tick).xls
102.91 KB
-
HAO vs TGMA (mosquito).xls
327.17 KB
-
HAO.obo
826 KB
-
SPD.obo
130.81 KB
-
TADS.obo
263.85 KB
-
TGMA.obo
988.75 KB
Abstract
Matching is an important step for increasing interoperability between heterogeneous ontologies. Here, we present alignments we produced as domain experts, using a manual mapping process, between the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology and other existing arthropod anatomy ontologies (representing spiders, ticks, mosquitoes and Drosophila melanogaster). The resulting alignments contain from 43 to 368 mappings (correspondences), all derived from domain-expert input. Despite the many pairwise correspondences, only 11 correspondences were found in common between all ontologies, suggesting either major intrinsic differences between each ontology or gaps in representing each group’s anatomy. Furthermore, we compare our findings with putative correspondences from Bioportal (derived from LOOM software) and summarize the results in a total evidence alignment. We briefly discuss characteristics of the ontologies and issues with the matching process.