CODEBOOK ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 1,002 Cases ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page i CONTENTS item page Introduction iv IDENTIFICATION CASEID CASE ID 1 ANALYSIS WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT 1 WT WT 1 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIABLES YEAR YEAR OF SURVEY 1 BACKGROUND VARIABLES Q1 TYPE OF CURRENT RESIDENCE 2 Q2 HOW LONG LIVE IN OC 2 Q3 HOW LONG LIVE AT CURRENT RESIDENCE 3 Q4 OWN/RENT PRESENT RESIDENCE 3 Q5 MONTHLY RENTAL PAYMENT 4 Q6 MONTHLY MORTGAGE PAYMENT 4 Q77 WORK STATUS 5 Q82 AGE 5 Q83 EDUCATION 6 Q84 NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD 6 Q85 NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN HHOLD 7 Q86 RESIDENCE 7 Q87 ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME 8 Q89 PARTY 8 Q94 SEX 9 GEOGRAPHIC ORANGE COUNTY ISSUES Q12 QUALITY OF LIFE IN OC 9 Q13 MOST SERIOUS PUBLIC POLICY PROBLEM 10 Q14 MOST SERIOUS SOCIAL PROBLEM 10 Q15 OC IN FUTURE 11 Q16 POP GROWTH IN CITY PAST FEW YRS 11 Q17 CURRENT GROWTH REGS IN CITY 12 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page ii item page Q18 FEELING ABOUT FREEWAYS IN OC 12 Q19 WHAT PRIORITY: BUILDING NEW FWYS 13 Q20 WHAT PRIORITY: WIDENING EXISTING FWYS 13 Q21 WHAT PRIORITY: IMPROVING LOCAL STREETS 14 Q22 WHAT PRIORITY: IMPROVING BUS SERVICE 14 Q23 WHAT PRIORITY: BUILDING LOCAL RAIL SYST 15 Q24 WHAT PRIORITY: EXPANDING LA-SDIEGO RAIL 15 Q25 WHAT PRIORITY: SYNCH. TRAFFIC SIGNALS 16 Q26 WHAT PRIORITY: EXPRESS BUS IN FWY LANE 16 Q27 NOTICED IMPROVEMENTS SINCE MEASURE M 17 Q28 THINK MEAS M FUNDS BEING SPENT WISELY 17 Q29 RATE ROAD MAINTENANCE 18 Q30 RATE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM 18 Q31 RATE POLICE PROTECTION 19 Q32 RATE PARKS AND REC FACILITIES 19 Q33 RATE CITY GOVERNMENT 20 Q34 HOW SATISFIED WITH HOUSING 20 Q35 HOW SATISFIED WITH NEIGHBORHOOD 21 Q36 HOW SATISFIED WITH JOB 21 Q37 HOW SATISFIED WITH FINANCES 22 Q38 HOW THINGS ARE THESE DAYS 22 Q39 HOW OFTEN BUY EMISSION CONTROL GAS 23 Q40 HOW OFTEN BUY RECYCLED PRODUCTS 23 Q41 HOW OFTEN RECYCLE PAPERS, GLASS CANS 24 Q42 HOW OFTEN CONSERVE WATER AT HOME 24 Q43 HOW OFTEN HEARD ABOUT ENV PROBLEMS 25 Q44 HOW SERIOUS A THREAT ARE ENV PROBS 25 Q45 HOW FAMILIAR WITH AQMP 26 Q46 OPINION OF REGIONAL AIR QUAL AGENCY 26 Q47 CHARGING SOLO DRIVERS TO PARK 27 Q48 CHARGING SOLO DRIVERS CONGESTION FEE 27 Q49 CHARGING SOLO DRIVERS SMOG FEE 28 Q50 IF EMPLOYER OFFERED $50 28 Q51 WHAT WOULD MOST PEOPLE DO W/ $50 29 Q52 IF HEARD MOST PEOPLE WD DRIVE ALONE 29 Q53 WHAT WOULD MOST PEOPLE DO IF HEARD 30 Q76 $ GAVE TO ALL CHARITIES LAST YR 30 Q78 WORKPLACE 31 Q79 HOW COMMUTE TO WORK 31 Q80 TIME FROM HOME TO WORK 32 Q81 HOW MUCH PROBLEM TRAFFIC 32 STATE ISSUES June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page iii item page NATIONAL ISSUES Q7 BETTER OFF/WORSE OFF/SAME LAST YEAR 33 Q8 BETTER OFF/WORSE OFF/SAME NEXT YEAR 33 Q9 NAT'L BUSINESS CONDS NEXT 12 MO 34 Q10 NAT'L CONDS NEXT 5 YEARS 34 Q11 GD/BAD TIME TO BUY MAJ HSEHOLD ITEMS 35 Q88 CONSIDER YOURSELF POLITICALLY: 35 Q90 DANNEMEYER/SEYMOUR CHOICE 36 Q91 CAMPBELL/HERSCHENSOHN CHOICE 36 Q92 DAVIS/FEINSTEIN CHOICE 37 Q93 BOXER/LEVINE/MCCARTHY CHOICE 37 APPENDIX APPENDIX 38 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page iv INTRODUCTION This 1991 report examines ten years of trends in the Orange county Annual Survey. In asking questions from the 1982 benchmark survey, we especially focus on the county's quality of life ratings and local public service ratings. We also examine changes over time in attitudes towards traffic congestion and growth, which have been the county's top two policy issues in the past decade. This reflection on ten years of trends comes at an historic time in Orange County. The 1990 U.S. Census finds the county has gained more than 475,000 residents in the past decade. It also indicates significant racial and ethnic change underway, with one in three Orange County residents now being Latino, Asian, or Black. In efforts to plan for the 1990s, we are interested in knowing how these dramatic changes have affected public attitudes. The 1991 Orange County Annual Survey also includes our traditional "tracking" questions on key issues we have explored in recent years. We look at trends in the identification of the county's most important public policy issues and social problems. We examine residents' ratings of the current quality of life in Orange county and their optimism about the county's future. Turning to new policy questions, we look at public attitudes toward transportation solutions a year after the Measure M sales tax was approved in Orange County. We also examine reactions to several air quality proposals. Finally, we examine trends in environmental practices and environmental quality concerns. Housing costs remain a major issue in Orange County. Thus, we analyze trends in mortgage payments and rental costs both for the county as a whole and its regions. We also continue to explore charitable giving, analyzing the trends in giving to charities over time and across the key demographic groups. Of particular relevance this year are changes in economic well-being. We analyze Orange County's responses to the University of Michigan's five-question "Consumer Confidence Index," comparing the answers this year to previous years, and to national statistics. Finally, we look at the political climate in Orange county, asking about the 1992 U.S. Senate primaries, and examine the profiles of Republican and Democratic party members. In analyzing the 1991 survey, we compare this year's results with those found in previous Orange County Annual Surveys. We also consider differences between various subgroups, such as age, income and region of residence. When possible, we also contrast local opinions with those found in state and national surveys. June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 1 CASEID CASE ID 1,002 cases (Range of valid codes: 2-4650) Data type: numeric Record/columns: 1/1-4 ________________________________________________________________________ WEIGHT WEIGHT % N VALUE LABEL 100.0 1,002 1.00 ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Decimals: 2 Record/columns: 1/79-86 ________________________________________________________________________ WT WT % N VALUE LABEL 34.0 341 0.80 20.7 207 0.95 28.9 290 1.08 16.4 164 1.35 ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Decimals: 2 Record/columns: 1/87-94 ________________________________________________________________________ YEAR YEAR OF SURVEY % N VALUE LABEL 100.0 1,002 1991 YEAR OF SURVEY ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Record/columns: 1/95-98 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 2 Q1 TYPE OF CURRENT RESIDENCE IS THE PLACE WHERE YOU CURRENTLY LIVE A: (ROTATE LIST) % N VALUE LABEL 57.1 570 1 SINGLE FAMILY 18.5 185 2 ATTACHED 20.0 200 3 APARTMENT 3.7 37 4 MOBILE 0.7 7 5 OTHER 3 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/5 ________________________________________________________________________ Q2 HOW LONG LIVE IN OC HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN ORANGE COUNTY? % N VALUE LABEL 13.2 132 1 0-2 YRS 13.1 131 2 3-5 YRS 11.4 114 3 6-10 YRS 28.7 287 4 11-20 YRS 33.6 336 5 21+ YRS 2 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/6 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 3 Q3 HOW LONG LIVE AT CURRENT RESIDENCE HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR CURRENT RESIDENCE? % N VALUE LABEL 37.2 372 1 0-2 YRS 22.1 221 2 3-5 YRS 12.6 126 3 6-10 YRS 18.6 186 4 11-20 YRS 9.6 96 5 21+ YRS 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/7 ________________________________________________________________________ Q4 OWN/RENT PRESENT RESIDENCE DO YOU OWNW OR RENT YOUR PRESENT RESIDENCE? % N VALUE LABEL 62.8 619 1 OWN 37.2 367 2 RENT 16 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/8 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 4 Q5 MONTHLY RENTAL PAYMENT WHAT IS YOUR CURRENT MONTHLY RENTAL PAYMENT? % N VALUE LABEL 14.8 52 1 UNDER $500 35.3 124 2 $501-$750 31.9 112 3 $751-$1,000 15.1 53 4 $1,001-$1,500 2.8 10 5 $1,501+ 651 9 NA, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/9 ________________________________________________________________________ Q6 MONTHLY MORTGAGE PAYMENT WHAT IS YOUR CURRENT MONTHLY MORTGAGE PAYMENT, NOT INCLUDING TAXES AND INSURANCE? % N VALUE LABEL 16.2 83 1 NOTHING 18.4 94 2 $1-$500 6.8 35 3 $501-$750 13.1 67 4 $751-$1,000 22.9 117 5 $1,001-$1,500 12.9 66 6 $1,501-$2,000 9.6 49 7 $2,001+ 491 9 NA, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/10 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 5 Q77 WORK STATUS WHAT IS YOUR CURRENT WORK STATUS? % N VALUE LABEL 60.3 599 1 FULL-TIME 13.5 134 2 PART-TIME 26.3 261 3 NOT EMPLOYED 8 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/59 ________________________________________________________________________ Q82 AGE WHAT IS YOUR AGE? % N VALUE LABEL 39.2 391 1 18-34 40.5 404 2 35-54 20.3 203 3 55+ 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/65 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 6 Q83 EDUCATION WHAT WAS THE LAST GRADE OF SCHOOL THAT YOU COMPLETED? % N VALUE LABEL 4.3 43 1 < H.S. 20.5 205 2 H.S. GRAD 35.4 354 3 SOME COLLEGE 26.2 262 4 COLLEGE GRAD 13.7 137 5 POST GRAD 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/66 ________________________________________________________________________ Q84 NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD HOW MANY PERSONS, INCLUDING YOURSELF, LIVE IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD? % N VALUE LABEL 17.7 177 1 1 32.2 321 2 2 18.0 180 3 3 18.8 188 4 4 8.8 88 5 5 2.6 26 6 6 1.2 12 7 7 0.6 6 8 8+ 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/67 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 7 Q85 NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN HHOLD HOW MANY CHILDREN, 18 AND UNDER, LIVE IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD? % N VALUE LABEL 58.4 580 0 NONE 16.8 167 1 ONE 16.4 163 2 TWO 8.5 84 3 THREE OR MORE 8 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/68 ________________________________________________________________________ Q86 RESIDENCE WHAT IS THE CITY OR COMMUNITY OF YOUR CURRENT RESIDENCE? % N VALUE LABEL 28.9 290 1 NORTH 20.7 207 2 WEST 16.4 164 3 CENTRAL 34.0 341 4 SOUTH ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Record/columns: 1/69-70 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 8 Q87 ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES BEST DESCRIBES YOUR TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME BEFORE TAXES, FROM ALL SOURCES? % N VALUE LABEL 14.5 127 1 UNDER $25,000 15.2 133 2 $25,000-$35,999 21.4 187 3 $36,000-$50,000 16.6 145 4 $50,001-$65,999 11.2 98 5 $66,000-$79,999 12.1 106 6 $80,000-$110,000 8.9 78 7 $110,001+ 128 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/71 ________________________________________________________________________ Q89 PARTY IF YOU ARE CURRENTLY REGISTERED TO VOTE, ARE YOU REGISTERED AS A DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN? % N VALUE LABEL 28.9 284 1 DEMOCRAT 51.2 504 2 REPUBLICAN 6.2 61 3 INDEP/OTHER 13.7 135 4 NOT REGISTERED 18 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/73 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 9 Q94 SEX INTERVIEWER RECORD SEX (CODE, DON’T READ): % N VALUE LABEL 47.5 476 1 MALE 52.5 526 2 FEMALE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Record/column: 1/78 ________________________________________________________________________ Q12 QUALITY OF LIFE IN OC THINKING ABOUT THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN ORANGE COUNTY, HOW DO YOU THINK THINGS ARE GOING? % N VALUE LABEL 11.1 109 1 VERY WELL 56.2 553 2 SOMEWHAT WELL 26.2 258 3 SOMEWHAT BADLY 6.5 64 4 VERY BADLY 18 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/16 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 10 Q13 MOST SERIOUS PUBLIC POLICY PROBLEM CONSIDERING ALL THE PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES IN ORANGE COUNTRY, WHICH OF THESE DO YOU THINK IS THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEM? (ROTATE LIST) % N VALUE LABEL 15.3 150 1 GROWTH 27.1 266 2 TRAFFIC 16.2 159 3 HOUSING 15.8 155 4 CRIME 13.8 135 5 SCHOOLS 9.7 95 6 IMMIGRATION 2.0 20 7 OTHER 22 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/17 ________________________________________________________________________ Q14 MOST SERIOUS SOCIAL PROBLEM AS FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL ISSUES, WHICH OF THESE DO YOU THINK IS ORANGE COUNTY’S MOST SERIOUS PROBLEM? (ROTATE LIST) % N VALUE LABEL 24.1 225 1 HEALTH CARE 10.3 96 2 CHILD CARE 7.5 70 3 RACE RELATIONS 13.5 126 4 HOMELESS 35.7 334 5 DRUG ABUSE 5.2 49 6 AIDS 3.7 35 7 OTHER 67 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/18 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 11 Q15 OC IN FUTURE IN THE FUTURE, DO YOU THINK ORANGE COUNTRY WILL BE: % N VALUE LABEL 25.3 244 1 BETTER PLACE 47.0 453 2 WORSE PLACE 27.6 266 3 NO CHANGE 39 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/19 ________________________________________________________________________ Q16 POP GROWTH IN CITY PAST FEW YRS IN THE LAST THREE YEARS, DO YOU THINK THE POPULATION IN YOUR CITY OR COMMUNITY HAS BEEN: % N VALUE LABEL 64.0 621 1 GROWING RAPIDLY 18.0 175 2 GROWING SLOWLY 17.1 166 3 STAYING SAME 0.9 9 4 LOSING POP 0.0 0 8 DK 31 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/20 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 12 Q17 CURRENT GROWTH REGS IN CITY DO YOU THINK THAT GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS IN YOUR CITY OR COMMUNITY AIMED AT CONTROLLING GROWTH ARE: % N VALUE LABEL 7.6 66 1 TOO STRICT 36.7 320 2 ABOUT RIGHT 55.7 485 3 NOT STRICT ENOUGH 131 9 DK,REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/21 ________________________________________________________________________ Q18 FEELING ABOUT FREEWAYS IN OC AND AS FOR THE ORANGE COUNTRY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DESCRIBES HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THE FREEWAYS IN ORANGE COUNTY? % N VALUE LABEL 12.2 106 1 SATISFACTORY 49.0 427 2 MORE LANES ONLY 38.9 339 3 NEW FREEWAYS 130 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/22 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 13 Q19 WHAT PRIORITY: BUILDING NEW FWYS THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? BUILDING NEW FREEWAYS. % N VALUE LABEL 33.5 336 1 HIGH PRIORITY 31.7 318 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 33.4 335 3 LOW PRIORITY 1.3 13 8 DK ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/23 ________________________________________________________________________ Q20 WHAT PRIORITY: WIDENING EXISTING FWYS THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? WIDENING EXISTING FREEWAYS. % N VALUE LABEL 55.8 557 1 HIGH PRIORITY 30.7 307 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 11.4 114 3 LOW PRIORITY 2.1 21 8 DK 3 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/24 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 14 Q21 WHAT PRIORITY: IMPROVING LOCAL STREETS THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? IMPROVING LOCAL STREETS. % N VALUE LABEL 32.1 322 1 HIGH PRIORITY 41.3 414 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 25.3 254 3 LOW PRIORITY 1.2 12 8 DK ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/25 ________________________________________________________________________ Q22 WHAT PRIORITY: IMPROVING BUS SERVICE THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? IMPROVING LOCAL BUS SERVICE. % N VALUE LABEL 32.9 328 1 HIGH PRIORITY 25.9 258 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 26.8 267 3 LOW PRIORITY 14.5 145 8 DK 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/26 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 15 Q23 WHAT PRIORITY: BUILDING LOCAL RAIL SYST THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? BUILDING A LOCAL RAIL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. % N VALUE LABEL 49.9 498 1 HIGH PRIORITY 21.6 216 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 25.4 253 3 LOW PRIORITY 3.1 31 8 DK 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/27 ________________________________________________________________________ Q24 WHAT PRIORITY: EXPANDING LA-SDIEGO RAIL THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? BUILDING A COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM IN ORANGE COUNTY WITH CONNECTIONS TO LOS ANGELES, RIVERSIDE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES. % N VALUE LABEL 68.9 687 1 HIGH PRIORITY 19.2 191 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 10.6 106 3 LOW PRIORITY 1.3 13 8 DK 5 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/28 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 16 Q25 WHAT PRIORITY: SYNCH. TRAFFIC SIGNALS THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? SYNCHRONIZING TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON MAJOR STREETS. % N VALUE LABEL 62.2 622 1 HIGH PRIORITY 23.1 231 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 13.0 130 3 LOW PRIORITY 1.7 17 8 DK 2 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/29 ________________________________________________________________________ Q26 WHAT PRIORITY: EXPRESS BUS IN FWY LANE THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALL THE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED FOR ORANGE COUNTY. DO YOU CONSIDER EACH OF THE COLLOW PROJECTS TO BE OF HIGH PRIORITY, MEDIUM PRIORITY, OR LOW PRIORITY IF FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE? PROVIDING EXPRESS BUS SERVICE ON HIGH OCCUPANCY FREEWAY LANES. % N VALUE LABEL 45.2 451 1 HIGH PRIORITY 32.2 321 2 MEDIUM PRIORITY 17.8 178 3 LOW PRIORITY 4.8 48 8 DK 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/30 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 17 Q27 NOTICED IMPROVEMENTS SINCE MEASURE M MEASURE M, APPROVED BY 54 PERCENT OF ORANGE COUNTY VOTERS LAST NOVEMBER, ESTABLISHES A ONE-HALF CENT SALES TAX TO PAY FOR FREEWAYS, LOCAL STREETS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS. HAVE YOU NOTICED ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO ORANGE COUNTY’S TRAFFIC PROBLEMS AS A RESULT OF MESAURE M? % N VALUE LABEL 20.6 206 1 YES 70.0 699 2 NO 9.4 94 8 DK 3 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/31 ________________________________________________________________________ Q28 THINK MEAS M FUNDS BEING SPENT WISELY IN YOUR OPINION, ARE MEASURE M FUNDS BEING SPENT WISELY? % N VALUE LABEL 19.7 196 1 YES 39.8 396 2 NO 40.4 402 8 DK 8 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/32 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 18 Q29 RATE ROAD MAINTENANCE I’D LIKE TO ASK YOU HOW YOU WOULD RATE SOME OF THE MAIN PUBLIC SERVICES YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO RECEIVE. THE WAY STREETS AND ROADS ARE KEPT UP. % N VALUE LABEL 10.3 103 1 EXCELLENT 49.3 493 2 GOOD 31.5 315 3 FAIR 8.2 82 4 POOR 0.8 8 8 DK 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/33 ________________________________________________________________________ Q30 RATE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM I’D LIKE TO ASK YOU HOW YOU WOULD RATE SOME OF THE MAIN PUBLIC SERVICES YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO RECEIVE. THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM. % N VALUE LABEL 5.8 58 1 EXCELLENT 23.4 234 2 GOOD 27.5 274 3 FAIR 26.8 267 4 POOR 16.5 165 8 DK 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/34 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 19 Q31 RATE POLICE PROTECTION I’D LIKE TO ASK YOU HOW YOU WOULD RATE SOME OF THE MAIN PUBLIC SERVICES YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO RECEIVE. POLICE PROTECTION. % N VALUE LABEL 10.6 106 1 EXCELLENT 49.4 494 2 GOOD 27.3 273 3 FAIR 8.6 86 4 POOR 4.1 41 8 DK 2 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/35 ________________________________________________________________________ Q32 RATE PARKS AND REC FACILITIES I’D LIKE TO ASK YOU HOW YOU WOULD RATE SOME OF THE MAIN PUBLIC SERVICES YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO RECEIVE. PARKS AND OTHER PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES. % N VALUE LABEL 18.4 184 1 EXCELLENT 54.2 543 2 GOOD 17.3 173 3 FAIR 6.9 69 4 POOR 3.2 32 8 DK 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/36 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 20 Q33 RATE CITY GOVERNMENT HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE PERFORMANCE OF YOUR CITY GOVERNMENT IN SOLVING PROBLEMS IN YOUR COMMUNITY? (COUNTY IF THEY SAY THEY LIVE IN AN INCORPORATED AREA) % N VALUE LABEL 4.3 43 1 EXCELLENT 35.5 354 2 GOOD 36.3 362 3 FAIR 12.3 123 4 POOR 11.6 116 8 DK 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/37 ________________________________________________________________________ Q34 HOW SATISFIED WITH HOUSING HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH EACH OF THE FOLLOWING? THE HOUSE OR APARTMENT IN WHICH YOU LIVE. % N VALUE LABEL 57.0 571 1 VERY SATISFIED 34.3 343 2 SOMEWHAT SAT 5.9 59 3 SOMEWHAT DISSAT 2.6 26 4 VERY DISSAT 0.2 2 8 DK 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/38 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 21 Q35 HOW SATISFIED WITH NEIGHBORHOOD HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH EACH OF THE FOLLOWING? THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN WHICH YOU LIVE. % N VALUE LABEL 55.9 560 1 VERY SATISFIED 34.1 341 2 SOMEWHAT SAT 6.5 65 3 SOMEWHAT DISSAT 3.3 33 4 VERY DISSAT 0.2 2 8 DK 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/39 ________________________________________________________________________ Q36 HOW SATISFIED WITH JOB HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH EACH OF THE FOLLOWING? YOUR JOB. % N VALUE LABEL 39.3 393 1 VERY SATISFIED 27.2 272 2 SOMEWHAT SAT 5.7 57 3 SOMEWHAT DISSAT 3.3 33 4 VERY DISSAT 24.5 245 8 DK, NA 2 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/40 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 22 Q37 HOW SATISFIED WITH FINANCES HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH EACH OF THE FOLLOWING? YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION. % N VALUE LABEL 21.5 214 1 VERY SATISFIED 52.7 524 2 SOMEWHAT SAT 16.4 163 3 SOMEWHAT DISSAT 8.9 89 4 VERY DISSAT 0.5 5 8 DK 7 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/41 ________________________________________________________________________ Q38 HOW THINGS ARE THESE DAYS TAKEN ALL TOGETHER, HOW WOULD YOU SAY THINGS ARE THESE DAYS? WOULD YOU SAY YOU’RE: % N VALUE LABEL 27.4 272 1 VERY HAPPY 60.5 601 2 PRETTY HAPPY 12.1 120 3 NOT TOO HAPPY 9 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/42 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 23 Q39 HOW OFTEN BUY EMISSION CONTROL GAS ON ANOTHER TOPIC, THE ENVIRONMENT, HOW OFTEN DO YOU DO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING—MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER OR NEVER? BUY THE LESS-POLLUTING, EMISSION-CONTROL GASOLINES—INSTEAD OF REGULAR OR REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINES—FOR YOUR CAR. % N VALUE LABEL 52.6 484 1 MOST OF THE TIME 13.0 120 2 SOME OF THE TIME 10.6 98 3 HARDLY EVER 23.8 219 4 NEVER 81 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/43 ________________________________________________________________________ Q40 HOW OFTEN BUY RECYCLED PRODUCTS ON ANOTHER TOPIC, THE ENVIRONMENT, HOW OFTEN DO YOU DO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING—MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER OR NEVER? BUY PRODUCTS THAT ARE MADE FROM OR PACKAGED IN RECYCLED MATERIALS. % N VALUE LABEL 53.7 514 1 MOST OF THE TIME 37.1 355 2 SOME OF THE TIME 5.9 56 3 HARDLY EVER 3.3 32 4 NEVER 45 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/44 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 24 Q41 HOW OFTEN RECYCLE PAPERS, GLASS CANS ON ANOTHER TOPIC, THE ENVIRONMENT, HOW OFTEN DO YOU DO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING—MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER OR NEVER? RECYCLE NERSPAPERS, GLASS AND ALUMINUM CANS. % N VALUE LABEL 75.7 755 1 MOST OF THE TIME 13.3 133 2 SOME OF THE TIME 4.6 46 3 HARDLY EVER 6.3 63 4 NEVER 5 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/45 ________________________________________________________________________ Q42 HOW OFTEN CONSERVE WATER AT HOME ON ANOTHER TOPIC, THE ENVIRONMENT, HOW OFTEN DO YOU DO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING—MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER OR NEVER? CONSERVE WATER USE AT YOUR HOME. % N VALUE LABEL 83.8 840 1 MOST OF THE TIME 13.0 130 2 SOME OF THE TIME 1.6 16 3 HARDLY EVER 1.6 16 4 NEVER ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/46 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 25 Q43 HOW OFTEN HEARD ABOUT ENV PROBLEMS IN THE PAST YEAR, HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS—SUCH AS AIR AND WATER POLLUTION—OCCURING IN ORANGE COUNTY? % N VALUE LABEL 67.7 673 1 FREQUENTLY 24.6 245 2 OCCASIONALLY 6.3 63 3 RARELY 1.3 13 4 NEVER 0.0 0 8 DK 8 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/47 ________________________________________________________________________ Q44 HOW SERIOUS A THREAT ARE ENV PROBS IN GENERAL, HOW SERIOUS A THREAT DO YOU THINK ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS—SUCH AS AIR AND WATER POLLUTION—ARE TO YOUR WELL-BEING AND HEALTH TODAY? % N VALUE LABEL 58.1 581 1 VERY SERIOUS 32.8 328 2 SOMEWHAT SERIOUS 9.0 90 3 NOT TOO SERIOUS 0.1 1 8 DK 2 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/48 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 26 Q45 HOW FAMILIAR WITH AQMP THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RECENTLY APPROVED A PLAN TO REDUCE AIR POLLUTION. SOME OF THE PROPOSALS PLACE NEW RESTRICTIONS ON INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES. HOW FAMILIAR ARE YOU WITH THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN? % N VALUE LABEL 10.1 101 1 VERY FAMILIAR 33.6 336 2 SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR 56.1 562 3 NOT FAMILIAR 0.2 2 8 DK 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/49 ________________________________________________________________________ Q46 OPINION OF REGIONAL AIR QUAL AGENCY HOW FAVORABLE ARE YOU TOWARD HAVING A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL AGENCY, RATHER THAN A COUNTRY AGENCY, RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPROVING AIR QUALITY? % N VALUE LABEL 26.0 259 1 VERY FAVORABLE 36.7 366 2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 19.4 194 3 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 0.0 0 4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 17.9 179 8 DK 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/50 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 27 Q47 CHARGING SOLO DRIVERS TO PARK CURRENTLY, SEVERAL PROPOSALS ARE BEING DISCUSSED AS WAYS TO DISCOURAGE SOLO DRIVING, AND THUS REDUCE AIR POLLUTION AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT CHARGING SOLO COMMUTERS TO PARK AT WORK? % N VALUE LABEL 10.8 107 1 STRONGLY FAVOR 20.1 200 2 SOMEWHAT FAVOR 23.6 235 3 SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 41.8 416 4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 3.7 37 8 DK 7 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/51 ________________________________________________________________________ Q48 CHARGING SOLO DRIVERS CONGESTION FEE HOW ABOUT CHARGING SOLO COMMUTERS CONGESTION FEES FOR DRIVING ON BUSY ROUTES DURING RUSH HOUR? % N VALUE LABEL 8.9 89 1 STRONGLY FAVOR 18.4 183 2 SOMEWHAT FAVOR 23.7 236 3 SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 46.0 458 4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 3.0 30 8 DK 6 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/52 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 28 Q49 CHARGING SOLO DRIVERS SMOG FEE HOW ABOUT CHARGING SOLOL COMMUTERS SMOG FEES, BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF DRIVING AND HOW MUCH THE CAR POLLUTES? % N VALUE LABEL 16.4 164 1 STRONGLY FAVOR 24.5 245 2 SOMEWHAT FAVOR 18.3 183 3 SOMEWHAT OPPOSE 38.0 379 4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 2.7 27 8 DK 4 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/53 ________________________________________________________________________ Q50 IF EMPLOYER OFFERED $50 WHAT IF YOUR EMPLOYER OFFERED YOU $50 A MONTH IF YOU COMMUTED TO WORK IN A CORPOOL OR TOOK PUBLIC TRANSIT INSTEAD OF DRIVING ALONE? WOULD YOU DECIDE TO CARPOOL, OR TAKE PUBLIC TRANSIT, OR WOULD YOU DRIVE ALONE. % N VALUE LABEL 56.7 494 1 CARPOOL 7.9 69 2 PUBLIC TRANSIT 30.4 265 3 DRIVE ALONE 4.9 43 8 DK 131 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/54 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 29 Q51 WHAT WOULD MOST PEOPLE DO W/ $50 WHAT DO YOU THINK MOST PEOPLE IN ORANGE COUNTY WOULD DO IF THEIR EMPLOYER OFFERED THEM $50 A MONTH TO CARPOOL OR TAKE PUBLIC TRANSIT INSTEAD OF DRIVING ALONE? WOULD THEY DECIDE TO CARPOOL, OR TAKE THE PUBLIC TRANSIT, OR WOULD THEY DRIVE ALONE? % N VALUE LABEL 48.2 480 1 CARPOOL 3.6 36 2 PUBLIC TRANSIT 38.5 383 3 DRIVE ALONE 9.7 97 8 DK 6 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/55 ________________________________________________________________________ Q52 IF HEARD MOST PEOPLE WD DRIVE ALONE WHAT IF YOU HEARD THAT THE UCI ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY FOUND 80 PERCENT OF RESIDENTS WOULD DRIVE ALONE EVEN IF THEIR EMPLOYER OFFERED THEM $50 A MONTH TO CARPOOL OR TAKE PUBLIC TRANSIT? WOULD HEARING THIS MAKE YOU MUCH MORE LIKELY, SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY, SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY OR MUCH LESS LIKELY TO CARPOOL OR TAKE PUBLIC TRANSIT, OR WOULD IT MAKE NO DIFFERENCE? % N VALUE LABEL 8.2 73 1 MUCH MORE LIKELY 12.4 111 2 SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 74.2 663 3 NO DIFFERENCE 1.3 12 4 SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY 0.4 4 5 MUCH LESS LIKELY 3.4 30 8 DK 109 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/56 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 30 Q53 WHAT WOULD MOST PEOPLE DO IF HEARD WHAT ABOUT MOST PEOPLE IN ORANGE COUNTY? WOULD HEARING THIS MAKE THEM MUCH MORE LIKELY, SOMEWAT MORE LIKELY, SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY OR MUCH LESS LIKELY TO CARPOOL OR TAKE PUBLIC TRANSIT, OR WOULD IT MAKE NO DIFFERENCE? % N VALUE LABEL 4.8 48 1 MUCH MORE LIKELY 24.1 240 2 SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 52.4 521 3 NO DIFFERENCE 6.7 67 4 SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY 2.1 21 5 MUCH LESS LIKELY 9.8 98 8 DK 7 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/57 ________________________________________________________________________ Q76 $ GAVE TO ALL CHARITIES LAST YR ON ANOTHER ISSUE, HOW MUCH MONEY DID YOU GIVE TO ALL CHARITIES LAST YEAR? % N VALUE LABEL 10.1 94 1 NOTHING 22.4 209 2 $1-$100 19.4 181 3 $101-$250 19.1 178 4 $251-$500 8.3 77 5 $501-$999 20.6 192 6 $1000+ 71 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/58 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 31 Q78 WORKPLACE WHAT IS THE CITY OR COMMUNITY OF YOUR WORKPLACE? (CODE DIRECTLY) % N VALUE LABEL 21.2 154 1 NORTH 10.4 76 2 WEST 18.4 134 3 CENTRAL 29.0 211 4 SOUTH 17.2 125 5 LA COUNTY 3.8 28 8 OTHER 274 9 NA, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/columns: 1/60-61 ________________________________________________________________________ Q79 HOW COMMUTE TO WORK HOW DO YOU USUALLY COMMUTE TO WORK? % N VALUE LABEL 79.2 580 1 DRIVE ALONE 11.9 87 2 CARPOOL 1.1 8 3 VANPOOL 1.2 9 4 PUBLIC TRANSIT 6.6 48 5 OTHER 270 9 NA, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/62 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 32 Q80 TIME FROM HOME TO WORK ON A TYPICAL DAY, HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE YOU TO GET FROM YOUR HOME TO THE PLACE WHERE YOU REPORT TO WORK? % N VALUE LABEL 25.7 185 1 LESS THAN 10 MIN 32.5 234 2 10-20 MIN 19.3 139 3 21-30 MIN 17.2 124 4 31-60 MIN 5.1 37 5 1 HOUR + 283 9 NA, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/63 ________________________________________________________________________ Q81 HOW MUCH PROBLEM TRAFFIC ON A TYPICAL DAY, HOW MUCH OF A PROBLEM IS TRAFFIC CONGESTION WHEN YOU TRAVEL TO AND FROM WORK? WOULD YOU SAY IT IS: % N VALUE LABEL 39.8 287 1 NO PROBLEM 41.5 299 2 SLIGHT PROBLEM 18.7 135 3 GREAT PROBLEM 281 9 NA, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/64 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 33 Q7 BETTER OFF/WORSE OFF/SAME LAST YEAR WOULD YOU SAY YOU (AND YOUR FAMILY) ARE FINANCIALLY BETTER OFF OR WORSE OFF THAN YOU WERE A YEAR AGO? % N VALUE LABEL 36.8 364 1 BETTER OFF 27.8 275 2 WORSE OFF 35.5 351 3 SAME 12 9 DK, REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/11 ________________________________________________________________________ Q8 BETTER OFF/WORSE OFF/SAME NEXT YEAR NOW LOOKING AHEAD, DO YOU THINK THAT A YEAR FROM NOW YOU (AND YOUR FAMILY) WILL BE BETTER OFF, WORSE OFF, OR JUST ABOUT THE SAME AS NOW? % N VALUE LABEL 49.6 496 1 BETTER OFF 8.8 88 2 WORSE OFF 37.4 374 3 SAME 4.2 42 8 DK 2 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/12 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 34 Q9 NAT'L BUSINESS CONDS NEXT 12 MO TURNING TO BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRY AS A WHOLE, DO YOU THINK THAT DURING THE NEXT 12 MONTHS WE WILL HAVE GOOD TIMES FINANCIALLY OR BAD TIMES? % N VALUE LABEL 41.6 413 1 GOOD TIMES 45.1 448 2 BAD TIMES 13.3 132 8 DK 9 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/13 ________________________________________________________________________ Q10 NAT'L CONDS NEXT 5 YEARS LOOKING AHEAD, IN THE COUNTRY AS A WHOLE WILL WE HAVE CONTINUED GOOD TIMES DURING THE NEXT 5 YEARS OF WILL WE HAVE PERIODS OF WIDESPREAD UNEMPLOYEMENT OR DEPRESSION? % N VALUE LABEL 40.5 403 1 GOOD TIMES 49.7 495 2 DEPRESSION 9.7 97 8 DK 7 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/14 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 35 Q11 GD/BAD TIME TO BUY MAJ HSEHOLD ITEMS ABOUT THE BIG THINGS THAT PEOPLE BUY FOR THEIR HOMES, SUCH AS FURNITURE, A REFRIGERATOR, A STOVE, TELEVISION AND THINGS LIKE THAT –GENERALLY SPEAKING, DO YOU THINK NOW IS A GOOD OR A BAD TIME FOR PEOPLE TO BUY MAJOR HOUSEHOLD ITEMS? % N VALUE LABEL 52.8 529 1 GOOD TIME 34.3 343 2 BAD TIME 12.9 129 8 NEITHER, DK 1 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/15 ________________________________________________________________________ Q88 CONSIDER YOURSELF POLITICALLY: WOULD YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF TO BE POLITICALLY: % N VALUE LABEL 8.5 82 1 VERY LIBERAL 21.8 210 2 SOMEWHAT LIBERAL 27.5 265 3 MIDDLE OF ROAD 30.7 295 4 SOMEWHAT CONSERV 11.4 110 5 VERY CONSERV 40 9 REFUSE ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/72 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 36 Q90 DANNEMEYER/SEYMOUR CHOICE IF YOU WERE VOTING TODAY IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY FOR THE U.S. SENATE SEAT WHICH CANDIDATE WOULD YOU VOTE FOR? (ROTATE) % N VALUE LABEL 22.6 114 1 DANNEMEYER 23.2 117 2 SEYMOUR 7.3 37 3 OTHER 46.8 236 8 DK 498 9 NA ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/74 ________________________________________________________________________ Q91 CAMPBELL/HERSCHENSOHN CHOICE IF YOU WERE VOTING TODAY IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY FOR THE OTHER U.S. SENATE SEAT, WHICH CANDIDATE WOULD YOU VOTE FOR? (ROTATE) % N VALUE LABEL 18.7 94 1 CAMPBELL 30.4 153 2 HERSCHENSOHN 4.4 22 3 OTHER 46.6 235 8 DK 498 9 NA ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/75 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 37 Q92 DAVIS/FEINSTEIN CHOICE IF YOU WERE VOTING TODAY IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY FOR THE U.S. SENATE SEAT, WHICH CANDIDATE WOULD YOU VOTE FOR? (ROTATE) % N VALUE LABEL 25.0 71 1 DAVIS 38.7 110 2 FEINSTEIN 7.4 21 3 OTHER 28.9 82 8 DK 718 9 NA ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/76 ________________________________________________________________________ Q93 BOXER/LEVINE/MCCARTHY CHOICE IF YOU WERE VOTING TODAY IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY FOR THE OTHER U.S. SENATE SEAT, WHICH CANDIDATE WOULD YOU VOTE FOR? (ROTATE) % N VALUE LABEL 9.2 26 1 BOXER 6.3 18 2 LEVINE 35.2 100 3 MCCARTHY 6.0 17 4 OTHER 43.3 123 8 DK 718 9 NA ----- ----- 100.0 1,002 cases Data type: numeric Missing-data code: 9 Record/column: 1/77 June 8, 2010 ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL SURVEY 1991 Page 38 METHODS The Orange County Annual Survey was co-directed by Mark Baldassare, a UC Irvine professor of social ecology, and Cheryl Katz, research associate. For the survey, 1,002 adult Orange County residents were interviewed by telephone Sept. 3 to 20. Interviewing was conducted on weekend days and weekday nights, using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers. The field work was conducted at the Center for Survey Research at UCI. Of the telephone numbers called, 21 percent resulted in completed interviews and 14 percent were refusals. The completion rate for the survey was 60 percent, consistent with earlier Orange County Annual Surveys. Within a household, respondents were chosen for interview using the Troldahl-Carter method. This method randomly selects a household member from a grid that includes information on the number of adult household members and the number of adult men in the household. Each interview included 93 questions and took an average of 20 minutes to complete. The interview began with questions about housing, consumer confidence, and general perceptions about Orange County. These were followed by questions on transportation, the quality of life, public service ratings, the environment, and air quality proposals. Later in the interview, we turned to the issues of health care and charity. The conclusion of the survey was devoted to questions about work, commuting, demographics, and politics. For analysis, we statistically weighted the sample to represent the actual regional distribution of Orange County residents, as in previous surveys. The 1990 U.S. Census population figures by city were reviewed for this purpose. The sampling error for this survey is +/-3 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. This means that 95 times out of 100, the results will be within 3 percentage points of what they would be if all adults in Orange County were interviewed. The sampling error for any subgroup would be larger. Sampling error is just one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by question wording, survey timing and survey design. June 8, 2010