This file contains data from: Thor Veen, Joseph Faulks, Frances Tyler, Jodie Lloyd and Tom Tregenza. Diverse reproductive barriers in hybridising crickets suggests extensive variation in the evolution and maintenance of isolation. Evolutionary Ecology. DOI: 10.1007/s10682-012-9610-2 Data collectors: Thor Veen, Joseph Faulks, Frances Tyler, Jodie Lloyd For information on data collection and methods, contact Thor Veen (thorveen@gmail.com) The absolute contribution of sequential reproductive barriers to the total reproductive isolation between between G. bimaculatus and G. campestris for each of the two mixed-species pairing types as depicted in Figure 1B. Each row represents one mating type. Columns: mating_type female x male species involved in trial (see example) The columns calling_song_preference, courtship_initiation, mounting, mating, number_of_eggs, hatching_success, longevity are different reproductive barrier as outlined in the main text. See the text for the calculation of the reproductive isolation index for each barrier and the calculation for the absolute contribution (AC) of each barrier (following Ramsey et al 2003). Positive values indicate a reduction of gene flow, negative values an enhancement. NA = missing value Mating_type example: bimac x camp represents a pair between female G. bimaculatus and male G. campestris Reference: Ramsey J, Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW (2003) Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:1520-1534