Data from: pH-Dependent friction of Polyacrylamide hydrogels
Data files
Sep 12, 2023 version files 402.77 KB
Abstract
Polyacrylamide hydrogels are widely used in biomedical applications due to their tunable mechanical properties and charge neutrality. Our recent tribological investigations of polyacrylamide gels have revealed tunable and pH-dependent friction behavior. To determine the origins of this pH-responsiveness, we prepared polyacrylamide hydrogels with two different initiating chemistries: a reduction-oxidation (redox)-initiated system using ammonium persulfate (APS) and N,N,N’N’-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) and a UV-initiated system with 2-hydroxy-4’-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone (Irgacure 2959). Hydrogel swelling, mechanical properties, and tribological behavior were investigated in response to solution pH (ranging from ~ 0.34 to 13.5). For polyacrylamide hydrogels in sliding contact with glass hemispherical probes, friction coefficients decreased from µ = 0.07 ± 0.02 to µ = 0.002 ± 0.002 (redox-initiated) and from µ = 0.05 ± 0.03 to µ = 0.003 ± 0.003 (UV-initiated) with increasing solution pH. With hemispherical polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) probes, friction coefficients of redox-initiated hydrogels similarly decreased from µ = 0.06 ± 0.01 to µ = 0.002 ± 0.001 with increasing pH. Raman spectroscopy measurements demonstrated hydrolysis and the conversion of amide groups to carboxylic acid in basic conditions. We therefore propose that the mechanism for pH-responsive friction in polyacrylamide hydrogels may be credited to hydrolysis-driven swelling through the conversion of side chain amide groups into carboxylic groups and/or crosslinker degradation. Our results could assist in the rational design of hydrogel-based tribological pairs for biomedical applications from acidic to alkaline conditions.
README
Data from peer-reviewed article:
Title: pH-Dependent Friction of Polyacrylamide Hydrogels
Journal: Tribology Letters
Authors: Allison L. Chau, Conor D. Pugsley, Madeleine E. Miyamoto, Yongkui Tang, Claus D. Eisenbach, Thomas E. Mates, Craig J. Hawker, Megan T. Valentine, and Angela A. Pitenis
Corresponding author: Angela Pitenis, apitenis@ucsb.edu
File List
A) Fig_2a.csv
B) Fig_2b.csv
C) Fig_3a.csv
D) Fig_3b.csv
E) Fig_5_FigS4.csv
F) Fig_S1.txt
G) Fig_S2.csv
H) Fig_S3.csv
I) Fig_S5a.csv
J) Fig_S5b.csv
K) Fig_S5c.csv
L) Fig_S5d.csv
M) Fig_S5e.csv
N) Fig_S5f.csv
O) Fig_S5gcsv
P) Fig_S5h.csv
Q) Fig_S6.csv
R) Fig_S7a.csv
S) Fig_S7b.csv
T) Friction_Irgacure.csv
U) Friction_TEMED_APS.csv
V) Modulus_Irgacure.csv
W) Modulus_TEMED_APS.csv
X) Swelling_Irgacure.csv
Y) Swelling_TEMED_APS.csv
Z) Volume_change_TEMED_APS.csv
FIGURE 2: friction and reduced elastic modulus data
A) Fig_2a.csv: friction coefficient vs. solution pH
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to solution pH (x) and friction coefficient average (y) and friction coefficient standard deviation (+/- y)
- row 2: initiating system (redox [TEMED + APS] or UV initiated [Irgacure]) and probe material (glass or PTFE)
- row 3 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels with glass probe - columns A + B + C
- dataset 2: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels with PTFE probe - columns A + D + E
- dataset 3: UV initiated (Irgacure) hydrogels with glass probe - columns A + F + G
- cells with n/a: data was not gathered for those conditions (pH = 2, pH = 10)
- Notes: data from Friction_Irgacure.csv and Friction_TEMED_APS.csv
B) Fig_2b.csv: reduced elastic modulus vs. solution pH
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to solution pH (x) and reduced elastic modulus average (y) and reduced elastic modulus standard deviation (+/- y)
- row 2: units for corresponding axes
- row 3: initiating system (redox [TEMED + APS] or UV initiated [Irgacure])
- row 4 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels with glass probe - columns A + B + C
- dataset 2: UV initiated (Irgacure) hydrogels with glass probe - columns A + D + E
- cells with n/a: data was not gathered for those conditions (UV initiated gels, pH = 13.5)
- Notes: data from Modulus_Irgacure.csv and Modulus_TEMED_APS.csv
FIGURE 3: swelling data
C) Fig_3a.csv: water content vs. solution pH
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to solution pH (x) and water content average (y) and water content standard deviation (+/- y)
- row 2: initiating system (redox [TEMED + APS] or UV initiated [Irgacure])
- row 3 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels - columns A + B + C
- dataset 2: UV initiated (Irgacure) hydrogels - columns A + D + E
- cells with n/a: data was not gathered for those conditions (UV initiated gels, pH = 13.5)
- Notes: data from Swelling_Irgacure.csv and Swelling_TEMED_APS.csv
D) Fig_3b.csv: volume change vs. solution pH
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to solution pH (x) and volume change average (y) and volume change standard deviation (+/- y)
- row 2: initiating system (redox [TEMED + APS])
- row 3 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels - columns A + B + C
- Notes: data from Volume_change_TEMED_APS.csv
FIGURE 5: Raman spectroscopy data (same data as shown in Figure S4)
E) Fig_5_FigS4.csv: Raman spectroscopy normalized intensity vs. wavenumber
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to wavenumber (x) and normalized intensity (y)
- row 2: units for corresponding axes
- row 3: solution (0.5 M HCl, DI water, or 0.5 M NaOH) or hydrogel type (polyacrylamide-co-acrylic acid [P(AAm-co-AA)]) with AA concentration (1, 5, 6, 9, or 12 wt)
- row 4 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels in 0.5 M HCl - columns A + B
- dataset 2: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels in DI water - columns C + D
- dataset 3: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels in 0.5 M NaOH - columns E + F
- dataset 4: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 1 wt AA in DI water - columns G + H
- dataset 5: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 5 wt AA in DI water - columns I + J
- dataset 6: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 6 wt AA in DI water - columns K + L
- dataset 7: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 9 wt AA in DI water - columns M + N
- dataset 8: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 12 wt AA in DI water - columns O + P
FIGURE S1: surface topography map information
F) Fig_S1.txt --> surface topography map information
- information about how the surface topography map was processed as well as the sample identifier (internal use)
FIGURE S2: x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data
G) Fig_S2.csv --> x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy counts vs. binding energy
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to binding energy (x) and counts per second (y)
- row 2: units for corresponding axes
- row 3: sample (acrylamide [AAm] powder, ammonium persulfate [APS] powder, bisacrylamide [MBAm] powder, or polyacrylamide [PAAm] hydrogel)
- row 4 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: AAm powder - columns A + B
- dataset 2: APS powder - columns C + D
- dataset 3: MBAm powder - columns E + F
- dataset 4: PAAm hydrogel (argon etched for 105 s) - columns G + H
FIGURE S3: Raman spectroscopy data
H) Fig_S3.csv --> Raman spectroscopy normalized intensity vs. wavenumber
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to wavenumber (x) and normalized intensity (y)
- row 2: units for corresponding axes
- row 3: solution (0.5 M HCl, DI water, or 0.5 M NaOH) or hydrogel type (polyacrylamide-co-acrylic acid [P(AAm-co-AA)]) with AA concentration (1, 5, 6, 9, or 12 wt)
- row 4 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels in 0.5 M HCl for three gels - columns A (x) + B (y for gel 1) + C (y for gel 2) + D (y for gel 3)
- dataset 2: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels in DI water for three gels - columns E (x) + F (y for gel 1) + G (y for gel 2) + H (y for gel 3)
- dataset 3: redox (TEMED + APS) hydrogels in 0.5 M NaOH for three gels - columns I (x) + J (y for gel 1) + K (y for gel 2) + L (y for gel 3)
- dataset 4: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 1 wt AA in DI water for three gels - columns M (x) + N (y for gel 1) + O (y for gel 2) + P (y for gel 3)
- dataset 5: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 5 wt AA in DI water for three gels - columns Q (x) + R (y for gel 1) + S (y for gel 2) + T (y for gel 3)
- dataset 6: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 6 wt AA in DI water for three gels - columns U (x) + V (y for gel 1) + W (y for gel 2) + X (y for gel 3)
- dataset 7: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 9 wt AA in DI water for three gels - columns Y (x) + Z (y for gel 1) + AA (y for gel 2) + AB (y for gel 3)
- dataset 8: P(AAm-co-AA) hydrogel with 12 wt AA in DI water for three gels - columns AC (x) + AD (y for gel 1) + AE (y for gel 2) + AF (y for gel 3)
FIGURE S5: Raman band deconvolution data
I) Fig_S5a.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - PAAm gels at pH = 0.34
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to wavenumber (x) and normalized intensity (y)
- row 2: units for corresponding axes
- row 3: data indentifier (peak number, cumulative fit, or measurement)
- row 4 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 7: peak fit 7 - columns M + N
- dataset 8: peak fit 8 - columns O + P
- dataset 9: cumulative peak fit - columns Q + R
- dataset 10: measurement - columns S + T
J) Fig_S5b.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - PAAm gels at pH = 7
- row 1: x and y axis, corresponding to wavenumber (x) and normalized intensity (y)
- row 2: units for corresponding axes
- row 3: data indentifier (peak number, cumulative fit, or measurement)
- row 4 and beyond: data
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 9: cumulative peak fit - columns M + N
- dataset 10: measurement - columns O + P
K) Fig_S5c.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - P(AAm-co-AA) gel with 1 wt AA
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 7: peak fit 7 - columns M + N
- dataset 8: peak fit 8 - columns O + P
- dataset 9: cumulative peak fit - columns Q + R
- dataset 10: measurement - columns S + T
L) Fig_S5d.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - P(AAm-co-AA) gel with 5 wt AA
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 7: peak fit 7 - columns M + N
- dataset 8: peak fit 8 - columns O + P
- dataset 9: cumulative peak fit - columns Q + R
- dataset 10: measurement - columns S + T
M) Fig_S5e.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - P(AAm-co-AA) gel with 6 wt AA
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 7: peak fit 7 - columns M + N
- dataset 8: peak fit 8 - columns O + P
- dataset 9: cumulative peak fit - columns Q + R
- dataset 10: measurement - columns S + T
N) Fig_S5f.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - P(AAm-co-AA) gel with 9 wt AA
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 7: peak fit 7 - columns M + N
- dataset 8: peak fit 8 - columns O + P
- dataset 9: cumulative peak fit - columns Q + R
- dataset 10: measurement - columns S + T
O) Fig_S5g.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - P(AAm-co-AA) gel with 12 wt AA
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 7: peak fit 7 - columns M + N
- dataset 8: peak fit 8 - columns O + P
- dataset 9: cumulative peak fit - columns Q + R
- dataset 10: measurement - columns S + T
P) Fig_S5h.csv --> Raman band deconvolution curve fitting - PAAm gels at pH = 13.5
- dataset 1: peak fit 1 - columns A + B
- dataset 2: peak fit 2 - columns C + D
- dataset 3: peak fit 3 - columns E + F
- dataset 4: peak fit 4 - columns G + H
- dataset 5: peak fit 5 - columns I + J
- dataset 6: peak fit 6 - columns K + L
- dataset 7: peak fit 7 - columns M + N
- dataset 8: peak fit 8 - columns O + P
- dataset 9: peak fit 9 - columns Q + R
- dataset 10: cumulative peak fit - columns S + T
- dataset 11: measurement - columns U + V
FIGURE S6: Raman linear calibration curve data
Q) Fig_S6.csv --> Raman linear calibration curve data
- Table 1: ratio of peaks vs. acrylic acid mol percent (A1-A9, E1-E9)
- Column A: hydrogel sample (polyacrylamide [PAAm] or poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) [P(AAm-co-AA)] and solution (DI water, HCl, or NaOH)
- Column B: acrylic acid (AA) mol% average
- Column C: acrylic acid (AA) mol% standard deviation
- Column D: ratio of peak areas (peak at 1555 cm^-1/peaks at 1670 cm^-1 and 1716 cm^-1) average
- Column E: ratio of peak areas (peak at 1555 cm^-1/peaks at 1670 cm^-1 and 1716 cm^-1) standard deviation
- cells with n/a: no standard deviation for those conditions (P(AAm-co-AA) gels)
- Table 2: ratio of peaks vs. ratio of acrylic acid/amide (G1-G9, J1-J9)
- Column A: ratio of acrylic acid mol/amide mol average
- Column B: ratio of acrylic acid mol/amide mol standard deviation
- Column C: ratio of peak areas (peak at 1555 cm^-1/peaks at 1617 cm^-1) average
- Column D: ratio of peak areas (peak at 1555 cm^-1/peaks at 1617 cm^-1) standard deviation
- cells with n/a: no standard deviation for those conditions (P(AAm-co-AA) gels)
FIGURE S7: switchable friction data
R) Fig_S7a.csv --> friction coefficient vs. solution pH - switchable friction data
- Table 1: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system (A2-A7, K2-K7)
- Column A: sample identifer (internal use)
- Column B: solution pH (pH = 0.35, 7, or 10)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 2: raw data for hydrogel with Irgacure initiating system (A9-A14, K9-K14)
- Column A: sample identifer (internal use)
- Column B: solution pH (pH = 0.35, 7, or 10)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 3: data for Figure S7a (A19-A23, E19-E23)
- Column A: solution pH
- Column B + C: friction coefficient average and standard deviation for the hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system
- Column D + E: friction coefficient average and standard deviation for the hydrogel with Irgacure initiating system
S) Fig_S7b.csv --> reduced elastic modulus vs. solution pH - TEMED + APS initiated gels
- Table 1: elastic modulus for PAAm sample in pH = 0.35 (0.5 M HCl) (B2-B24, J2-J24)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C: position
- Column D: cycle number
- Column E: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column G: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column H: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- cells with n/a: no cycle data at the specified position
- Table 2: elastic modulus for PAAm sample in pH = 7 (DI water) (L2-L24, T2-T24)
- Column L: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column M: position
- Column N: cycle number
- Column O: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Q: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column R: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column S + T: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 3: elastic modulus for PAAm sample in pH = 10.01 (0.001 M NaOH) (V2-V24, AD2-AD24)
- Column V: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column W: position
- Column X: cycle number
- Column Y: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column AA: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AB: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AC + AD: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- cells with n/a: no cycle data at the specified position
- Table 4: data for Figure S7a (A28-A33, C28-C33)
- Column A: solution pH
- Column B + C: elastic modulus average and standard deviation for the hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system
Compilation of raw friction coefficient data
T) Friction_Irgacure.csv
- Table 1: raw data for hydrogel with UV (Irgacure) initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) with glass probe (A1-A9, K1-K9)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 2: raw data for hydrogel with UV (Irgacure) initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) with glass probe (A12-A19, K12-K19)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 3: raw data for hydrogel with UV (Irgacure) initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) with glass probe (A22-A29, K22-K29)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 4: raw data for hydrogel with UV (Irgacure) initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) with glass probe (A32-A39, K32-K39)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
U) Friction_TEMED_APS.csv
- Table 1: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) with glass probe (A2-A10, K2-K10)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 2: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) with glass probe (A12-A19, K12-K19)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 3: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) with glass probe (A21-A28, K21-K28)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 4: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) with glass probe (A30-A37, K30-K37)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 5: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 13.5 (0.5 M NaOH) with glass probe (A39-A46, K39-K46)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C + D: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column E + F: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column G + H: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column I: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column J: number of cycles analyzed
- Column K: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 6: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) with PTFE probe (N2-N10, Y2-Y10)
- Column N: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column O: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column P: date/attempt (internal use)
- Column Q + R: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column S + T: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column U + V: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column W: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column X: number of cycles analyzed
- Column Y: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 7: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) with PTFE probe (N12-N19, Y12-Y19)
- Column N: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column O: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column P: date/attempt (internal use)
- Column Q + R: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column S + T: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column U + V: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column W: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column X: number of cycles analyzed
- Column Y: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
- Table 8: raw data for hydrogel with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 13.5 (0.5 M NaOH) with PTFE probe (N21-N28, Y21-Y28)
- Column N: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column O: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column P: date/attempt (internal use)
- Column Q + R: normal force average and standard deviation
- Column S + T: friction force average and standard deviation
- Column U + V: kinetic friction coefficient average and standard deviation
- Column W: cycle # where analysis begins (internal use)
- Column X: number of cycles analyzed
- Column Y: range of x position analyzed on the friction force loop (internal use)
Compilation of raw elastic modulus data
V) Modulus_Irgacure.csv
- Table 1: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) (A2-A24, I2-I24)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 2: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) (K2-K24, S2-S24)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 3: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) (U2-U24, AC2-AC24)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 4: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (A27-A49, I27-I49)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 5: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (K27-K49, S27-S49)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 6: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (U27-U49, AC27-AC49)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 7: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) (A52-A74, I52-I74)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 8: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) (K52-K74, S52-S74)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 9: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) (U52-U74, AC52-AC74)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 10: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (A77-A99, I77-I99)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 11: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (K77-K99, S77-S99)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 12: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (U77-U99, AC77-AC99)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Column AD + AE: averages and standard deviations of the three hydrogel samples at their specified solution pH
W) Modulus_TEMED_APS.csv
- Table 1: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) (A2-A24, I2-I24)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 2: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) (K2-K24, S2-S24)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 3: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) (U2-U24, AC2-AC24)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 4: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (A27-A46, I27-I46)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 5: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (K27-K46, S27-S46)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 6: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (U27-U46, AC27-AC46)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- cells with n/a: no cycle data at the specified position
- Table 7: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) (A49-A71, I49-I71)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- cells with n/a: no cycle data at the specified position
- Table 8: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) (K49-K71, S49-S71)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 9: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) (U49-U71, AC49-AC71)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 10: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (A75-A94, I75-I94)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 11: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (K75-K94, S75-S94)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- cells with n/a: no cycle data at the specified position
- Table 12: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (U75-U94, AC75-AC94)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 13: raw data for hydrogel sample 1 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 13.5 (0.5 M NaOH) (A97-A119, I97-I119)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: position
- Column C: cycle number
- Column D: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column E: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column F: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column G: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column I + J: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 14: raw data for hydrogel sample 2 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 13.5 (0.5 M NaOH) (K97-K119, S97-S119)
- Column K: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column L: position
- Column M: cycle number
- Column N: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column O: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column P: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column Q: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column R + S: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Table 12: raw data for hydrogel sample 3 with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 13.5 (0.5 M NaOH) (U97-U119, AC97-AC119)
- Column U: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column V: position
- Column W: cycle number
- Column X: maximum force reached during analysis
- Column Y: maximum contact pressure reached during analysis
- Column Z: maximum contact radius reached during analysis
- Column AA: estimated reduced elastic modulus using the Hertz model
- Column AB + AC: averages and standard deviation of reduced elastic modulus per position
- Column AD + AE: averages and standard deviations of the three hydrogel samples at their specified solution pH
Compilation of raw swelling data
X) Swelling_Irgacure.csv
- Table 1: raw data for hydrogels with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl) (A2-A7, L2-L7)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: acrylic acid mol% (0%)
- Column C: acrylamide mol% (100%)
- Column D: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column E: swollen mass (g)
- Column F: dried mass (g)
- Column G: q = swollen mass/dried mass ratio
- Column H: Q = ((swollen mass - dried mass)/swollen mass)*100
- Column I + J: q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Column K + L: Q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Table 2: raw data for hydrogels with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (A9-A14, L9-L14)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: acrylic acid mol% (0%)
- Column C: acrylamide mol% (100%)
- Column D: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column E: swollen mass (g)
- Column F: dried mass (g)
- Column G: q = swollen mass/dried mass ratio
- Column H: Q = ((swollen mass - dried mass)/swollen mass)*100
- Column I + J: q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Column K + L: Q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Table 3: raw data for hydrogels with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 7 (DI water) (A17-A22, L17-L22)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: acrylic acid mol% (0%)
- Column C: acrylamide mol% (100%)
- Column D: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column E: swollen mass (g)
- Column F: dried mass (g)
- Column G: q = swollen mass/dried mass ratio
- Column H: Q = ((swollen mass - dried mass)/swollen mass)*100
- Column I + J: q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Column K + L: Q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Table 4: raw data for hydrogels with Irgacure initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (A25-A30, L25-L30)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: acrylic acid mol% (0%)
- Column C: acrylamide mol% (100%)
- Column D: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column E: swollen mass (g)
- Column F: dried mass (g)
- Column G: q = swollen mass/dried mass ratio
- Column H: Q = ((swollen mass - dried mass)/swollen mass)*100
- Column I + J: q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Column K + L: Q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
Y) Swelling_TEMED_APS.csv
- Table 1: raw data for hydrogels with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 2 (0.01 M HCl) (A1-A6, L1-L6)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: acrylic acid mol% (0%)
- Column C: acrylamide mol% (100%)
- Column D: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column E: swollen mass (g)
- Column F: dried mass (g)
- Column G: q = swollen mass/dried mass ratio
- Column H: Q = ((swollen mass - dried mass)/swollen mass)*100
- Column I + J: q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Column K + L: Q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Table 2: raw data for hydrogels with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 10 (0.001 M NaOH) (A10-A15, L10-L15)
- Column A: hydrogel type (polyacrylamide)
- Column B: acrylic acid mol% (0%)
- Column C: acrylamide mol% (100%)
- Column D: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column E: swollen mass (g)
- Column F: dried mass (g)
- Column G: q = swollen mass/dried mass ratio
- Column H: Q = ((swollen mass - dried mass)/swollen mass)*100
- Column I + J: q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Column K + L: Q average and standard deviation of the three samples after 2 weeks of drying
- Table 3: raw data for hydrogels with TEMED + APS initiating system at pH = 0.34 (0.5 M HCl), pH = 7 (DI water), and pH = 13.5 (0.5 M NaOH)
- Column A: solution pH (pH = 0.34 [0.5 M HCl], pH = 7 [DI water], or pH = 13.5 [0.5 M NaOH])
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C: swollen mass (mg)
- Column D: dried mass (mg)
- Column E: Q = ((swollen mass - dried mass)/swollen mass)*100
- Column F + G: Q average and standard deviation of the three samples at the specified pH
Z) Volume_change_TEMED_APS.csv
- Column A: solution pH (pH = 0.3 [0.5 M HCl], pH = 7 [DI water], pH = 13.5 [0.5 M NaOH])
- Column B: sample identifier (internal use)
- Column C: hydrogel diameter (mm) after polymerization before swelling (triplicate measurements per sample)
- Column D: hp = hydrogel height (mm) after polymerization before swelling (triplicate measurements per sample)
- Column E: mp = hydrogel mass (g) after polymerization before swelling
- Column F: hydrogel diameter (mm) after swelling for 14 days in specified solution (triplicate measurements per sample)
- Column G: hs = hydrogel height (mm) after swelling for 14 days in specified solution (triplicate measurements per sample)
- Column H: ms = hydrogel mass (g) after swelling for 14 days in specified solution
- Column I: Vp = hydrogel volume (mm^3) after polymerization before swelling (assuming V = pi*r^2*h)
- Column J: Vs = hydrogel volume (mm^3) after swelling for 14 days in specified solution (assuming V = pi*r^2*h)
- Column K: volume change = ((Vs-Vp)/Vp)*100
- Column L: Q = (hs/hp)^3
- Column M: mass change = ((ms-mp)/mp)*100
- Column N + O: volume change average and standard deviation of the three samples at the specified pH
- cells with n/a: mass data was only collected once per sample
#############################################################################################
MATLAB CODES
MATLAB Codes: all codes are under MIT license- please cite the code if a significant portion has been used
A) Tribometer_Indent_Analysis_v5 --> uses natsortfiles function
B) Compiling_Friction_Data_v7 --> uses natsortfiles function
ANALYZING TRIBOMETER DATA
A) Tribometer_Indent_Analysis_v5: opens microtribometer indentation data from Excel files and fits the data with the Hertz contact mechanics model using the lsqcurvefit function
B) Compiling_Friction_Data_v7: opens microtribometer friction data from Excel files and calculates the friction coefficient from the specified x-range in the friction force loop over a specified number of cycles
FUNCTIONS TO DOWNLOAD
- Author: Stephen Cobeldick
- Download from: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/47434-natural-order-filename-sort
- Citation: Stephen23 (2023). Natural-Order Filename Sort (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/47434-natural-order-filename-sort), MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved 2021.
- Function of codes: reads and sorts through the files to analyze
- Functions: A) natsortfiles B) natsort
- Notes: natsortfiles calls natsort
Methods
Microindentations and sliding experiments were conducted with a custom-built linear reciprocating tribometer. Data was analyzed and processed with the following Matlab codes (Tribometer_Indent_Analysis_v5 and Compiling_Friction_Data_v7).
Raman spectroscopy was conducted with a confocal Raman microscope (Horiba Jobin Yvon T640000) with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and laser power of 400 mW. A 50x objective lens was used to focus the laser light 10 µm below the sample surface. Spectra data was obtained with a resolution of 0.66 cm-1.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was conducted with a Thermo Scientific ESCALABTM Xi+. A monochromatic Al/Kα x-ray radiation with a pass energy of 100 eV, dwell time of 50 ms, and spot size of 650 µm was used. Spectra were obtained after 105 s of etching using a 6 kV Ar1000+ cluster ion source.
Usage notes
All data is in .csv or .txt format and can be opened with any open-source software.