Higher-order sequences of vocal mimicry performed by male Albert’s lyrebirds are socially transmitted and enhance acoustic contrast
Data files
Nov 09, 2022 version files 16.32 MB
-
ALB_sequences_README.txt
6.75 KB
-
all.seq.csv
12.72 KB
-
all.seq.rds
4.42 KB
-
bird.distances.csv
4.76 KB
-
BRFTB1.mimicry.csv
86.40 KB
-
BRFTB2.a.mimicry.csv
28.24 KB
-
BRFTB2.b.mimicry.csv
457.31 KB
-
BRFTR1.a.mimicry.csv
22.80 KB
-
BRFTR1.b.mimicry.csv
32.09 KB
-
BRVP1.a.mimicry.csv
60 KB
-
BRVP1.b.mimicry.csv
27.61 KB
-
BRVP3.mimicry.csv
92.27 KB
-
GBLR2.a.mimicry.csv
28.33 KB
-
GBLR2.b.mimicry.csv
28.94 KB
-
GBLR3.mimicry.csv
74.62 KB
-
GBLR4.mimicry.csv
88.48 KB
-
GBSL1.mimicry.csv
434.66 KB
-
GBSLT.a.mimicry.csv
331 KB
-
GBSLT.b.mimicry.csv
56.39 KB
-
LBBC1.mimicry.csv
69.60 KB
-
LBBC2.mimicry.csv
85.29 KB
-
LBBC3.a.mimicry.csv
42.23 KB
-
LBBC3.b.mimicry.csv
13.62 KB
-
LBBC4.mimicry.csv
95.26 KB
-
LBBTW3.a.mimicry.csv
65.12 KB
-
LBBTW3.b.mimicry.csv
13.16 KB
-
LSI.all.csv
9.50 MB
-
mimicry.acc.csv
1.72 MB
-
MJKR1.mimicry.csv
47.01 KB
-
MJKRT1.mimicry.csv
61.15 KB
-
MJNR1.a.mimicry.csv
29.05 KB
-
MJNR1.b.mimicry.csv
32.54 KB
-
MJNR3.mimicry.csv
69.52 KB
-
MJNR4.mimicry.csv
93.54 KB
-
pop.distances.csv
593 B
-
TMCGB.a.mimicry.csv
23.84 KB
-
TMCGB.b.mimicry.csv
12.98 KB
-
TMKW1.mimicry.csv
73.08 KB
-
TMRC.mimicry.csv
56.58 KB
-
TMWFSB.mimicry.csv
57.07 KB
-
TMWFW.mimicry.csv
34.20 KB
-
units.for.sumstats.csv
2.24 MB
Abstract
Most studies of acoustic communication focus on short units of vocalisation such as songs, yet these units are often hierarchically organised into higher-order sequences, and outside human language, little is known about the drivers of sequence structure. Here we investigate the organisation, transmission, and function of vocal sequences sung by male Albert’s lyrebirds (Menura alberti), a species renowned for vocal imitations of other species. We quantified the organisation of mimetic units into sequences and examined the extent to which these sequences are repeated within and between individuals and shared among populations. We found that individual males organised their mimetic units into stereotyped sequences. Sequence structures were shared within and to a lesser extent among populations, implying that sequences were socially transmitted. Across the entire species range, mimetic units were sung with immediate variety and a high acoustic contrast between consecutive units, suggesting that sequence structure is a means to enhance receiver perceptions of repertoire complexity. Our results provide evidence that higher-order sequences of vocalisations can be socially transmitted, and that the order of vocal units can be functionally significant. We conclude that, to fully understand vocal behaviours, we must study both the individual vocal units and their higher-order temporal organisation.