Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Improved biodiversity detection using a large-volume environmental DNA sampler with in situ filtration and implications for marine eDNA sampling strategies

Citation

Govindarajan, Annette et al. (2022), Improved biodiversity detection using a large-volume environmental DNA sampler with in situ filtration and implications for marine eDNA sampling strategies, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.0zpc8670v

Abstract

Metabarcoding analysis of environmental DNA samples is a promising new tool for marine biodiversity and conservation. Typically, seawater samples are obtained using Niskin bottles and filtered to collect eDNA. However, standard sample volumes are small relative to the scale of the environment, conventional collection strategies are limited, and the filtration process is time consuming. To overcome these limitations, we developed a new large – volume eDNA sampler with in situ filtration, capable of taking up to 12 samples per deployment. We conducted three deployments of our sampler on the robotic vehicle Mesobot in the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico and collected samples from 20 to 400 m depth. We compared the large volume (~40 – 60 liters) samples collected by Mesobot with small volume (~2 liters) samples collected using the conventional CTD rosette – mounted Niskin bottle approach. We sequenced the V9 region of 18S rRNA, which detects a broad range of invertebrate taxa, and found that while both methods detected biodiversity changes associated with depth, our large volume samples detected approximately 66% more taxa than the CTD small volume samples. We found that the fraction of the eDNA signal originating from metazoans relative to the total eDNA signal decreased with sampling depth, indicating that larger volume samples may be especially important for detecting metazoans in mesopelagic and deep ocean environments. We also noted substantial variability in biological replicates from both the large volume Mesobot and small volume CTD sample sets. Both of the sample sets also identified taxa that the other did not – although the number of unique taxa associated with the Mesobot samples was almost four times larger than those from the CTD samples. Large volume eDNA sampling with in situ filtration, particularly when coupled with robotic platforms, has great potential for marine biodiversity surveys, and we discuss practical methodological and sampling considerations for future applications.

Methods

The data are raw sequence files from the eDNA datasets collected in the manuscript (fastq.gz files). They include samples collected using an autonomous sampler on the robot Mesobot, and samples collected from Niskin bottles, as described in the manuscript. The dataset was sequenced over 3 runs (678A, 678B, and 678C). Six samples were resequenced due to suspected mis-processing (described in the manuscript appendix) (reseq-A, reseq-B, and reseq-C).

Usage Notes

See README.docx

Funding

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

NOAA Ocean Exploration, Award: NA18OAR0110289

Universidade de Vigo

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Award: NA17NOS0080203

TED