Data from: Fitness consequences of artificial selection on relative male genital size
Data files
May 16, 2017 version files 2.75 MB
-
RealisedHeritabilityData.xlsx
1.46 MB
-
Supp 14 to 17 for gono.zip
32.02 KB
-
Supplementary Data 1_Gonopodium and SL for generations 1 to 9 .xlsx
753.34 KB
-
Supplementary Data 18_Within line fecundity.xlsx
50.53 KB
-
Supplementary Data 2_Gonopodium and SL for generation 10.xlsx
87.67 KB
-
Supplementary Data 3_Female choice trials.xlsx
84.53 KB
-
Supplementary Data 4_Burst swimming performance.xlsx
143.37 KB
-
Supplementary Data 5_Male reproductive success.xlsx
59.89 KB
-
Supps 6 to 13 for body shape.zip
82.06 KB
Abstract
Male genitalia often show remarkable differences among related species in size, shape and complexity. Across poeciliid fishes, the elongated fin (gonopodium) that males use to inseminate females ranges from 18 to 53% of body length. Relative genital size therefore varies greatly among species. In contrast, there is often tight within-species allometric scaling, which suggests strong selection against genital–body size combinations that deviate from a species’ natural line of allometry. We tested this constraint by artificially selecting on the allometric intercept, creating lines of males with relatively longer or shorter gonopodia than occur naturally for a given body size in mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. We show that relative genital length is heritable and diverged 7.6–8.9% between our up-selected and down-selected lines, with correlated changes in body shape. However, deviation from the natural line of allometry does not affect male success in assays of attractiveness, swimming performance and, crucially, reproductive success (paternity).