Data from: Evolutionarily labile dispersal behavior and discontinuous habitats enhance population differentiation in island vs continentally distributed swallows
Data files
Sep 27, 2023 version files 5.59 GB
-
README.md
2.10 KB
-
Tahiti_all_filtered_maxmean50.vcf.gz
5.59 GB
-
water_gaps_clean.csv
2.35 KB
Abstract
The causes of population divergence in vagile groups remain a paradox in evolutionary biology: dispersive species should be able to colonize new areas, a prerequisite for allopatric speciation, but dispersal also facilitates gene flow, which erodes population differentiation. Strong dispersal ability has been suggested to enhance divergence in patchy habitats and inhibit divergence in continuous landscapes, but empirical support for this hypothesis is lacking. Here we compared patterns of population divergence in a dispersive clade of swallows distributed across both patchy and continuous habitats. The Pacific Swallow (Hirundo tahitica) has an insular distribution throughout Southeast Asia and the Pacific, while its sister species, the Welcome Swallow (H. neoxena), has a continental distribution in Australia. We used whole-genome data to demonstrate strong genetic structure and limited introgression among insular populations, but not among continental populations. Demographic models show that historic changes in habitat connectivity have contributed to population structure within the clade. Swallows appear to exhibit evolutionarily labile dispersal behavior in which they reduce dispersal propensity after island colonization despite retaining strong flight ability. Our data support the hypothesis that fragmented habitats enhance population differentiation in vagile groups, and suggest that labile dispersal behavior is a key mechanism underlying this pattern.
README: Data from: Evolutionarily labile dispersal behavior and discontinuous habitats enhance population differentiation in island vs. continentally distributed swallows
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.18931zd3m
Description of the data and file structure
Included is a .vcf file of all samples used in the analysis filtered to have minimum depth of 5, maximum depth of 50, minimum read quality of 30, minor allele frequency of 5%, and less than 15% missing data. Outgroup samples are included. Metadata are available in Table S1 of the manuscript.
The water_gaps.csv file includes the geographic distances and water gap classifications used in analyses of isolation by distance.
- The first column indicates the minimum as the crow flies distance between populations in km.
- The second column indicates the distance between the center of two populations in km; this is relevant only for welcome swallows, where dispersed samples from across different regions of Australia were grouped into "populations".
- The third column gives the maximum water gap distance between populations in km. The NA's are for continental populations that are not separated by water gaps.
- The fourth column gives pairwise FST between populations.
- The fifth column indicates the water gap type, with cont = continental (i.e. no water gap), large = water gap > 600km, and small = water gap < 600km. The fifth column indicates which species/populations were compared in the contrast, among Pacific, Welcome, Hill, and Tahiti swallows. For example, "pac" indicates two Pacific swallow populations were compared and "pac_hill" indicates Pacific and Hill swallows were compared.
- The sixth column indicates whether the contrast is intra- or interspecific, with e.g. "pac" meaning an intraspecific pacific swallow comparison and "int_sp" indicating an interspecific comparison.
- The last column indicates the geographic regions used to measure the maximum water gap distance. For the continental populations, the last column gives which specific populations were compared.