Host specificity has a major influence on a parasite’s ability to shift between human and animal host species. Yet there is a dearth of quantitative approaches to explore variation in host specificity across biogeographical scales, particularly in response to the varying community compositions of potential hosts. We built a global dataset of intermediate host associations for nine of the world’s most widespread helminth parasites (all of which infect humans). Using hierarchical models, we asked if realised parasite host specificity varied in response to regional variation in the phylogenetic and functional diversities of potential host species. Parasites were recorded in 4-10 zoogeographical regions, with some showing considerable geographical variation in observed versus expected host specificity. Parasites generally exhibited the lowest phylogenetic host specificity in regions with the greatest variation in prospective host phylogenetic diversity, namely the Neotropical, Saharo-Arabian and Australian regions. Globally, we uncovered notable variation in parasite host shifting potential. Observed host assemblages for Hydatigera taeniaeformis and Hymenolepis diminuta were less phylogenetically diverse than expected, suggesting limited potential to spillover into unrelated hosts. Host assemblages for Echinococcus granulosus, Mesocestoides lineatus and Trichinella spiralis were less functionally diverse than expected, suggesting limited potential to shift across host ecological niches. By contrast, Hydatigera taeniaeformis infected a higher functional diversity of hosts than expected, indicating strong potential to shift across hosts with different ecological niches. We show that the realised phylogenetic and functional diversities of infected hosts are determined by biogeographical gradients in prospective host species pools. These findings emphasise the need to account for underlying species diversity when assessing parasite host specificity. Our framework to identify variation in realised host specificity is broadly applicable to other host-parasite systems and will provide key insights into parasite invasion potential at regional and global scales.
Global parasitic helminths – mammalian hosts association records
This data file contains association records of focal parasitic worm species (helminths) in different mammalian host species compiled from the publicly available Host-Parasite Database (http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/taxonomy-systematics/host-parasites/) of the Natural History Museum (NHM), London (Gibson et al., 2005). Data extraction and revision is described in Wells et al. (2018). Location names were standardised to country names of the current world geopolitical map and assigned to one of 11 zoogeographical regions according to Holt et al. (2013). Unique host-parasite-country records are given for nine focal parasite species: Calodium hepaticum (Nematoda), Echinococcus granulosus (Cestoda), Echinococcus multilocularis (Cestoda), Hydatigera taeniaeformis (Cestoda), Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda), Mesocestoides lineatus (Cestoda), Taenia hydatigena (Cestoda), Trichinella spiralis (Nematoda) and Versteria mustelae (Cestoda). For records of non-focal parasitic helminth species in different host species and locations, binomial species names have been replaced with “0” to represent the full range mammal species with records of any parasitic helminth species (i.e. potential host species pools).
Column titles refer to the following content for serial records of host-parasite associations:
Host.Species – Binomial name of mammalian host species for which an association has been recorded.
Host.Order – Taxonomic order of host species.
Parasite.Species - Binomial name of parasitic helminth species (nine focal species) for which an association has been recorded. Records of non-focal parasitic helminth species are indicated with “0”, including all records of mammalian host species in the original database in which the focal parasites were not recorded.
Parasite.Taxa – Taxonomic classification of parasitic helminth species.
Location.Name – Name of the location of association record according to original database.
Country – Country name matching the location name of association record according to contemporary world geopolitical map.
Zoogeogr.Region – Zoogeographical region matching the location name of association record according to Holt et al. (2013).
References:
Gibson, D. I. et al.(Compilers) (2005). Host-Parasite Database of the Natural History Museum, London. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/taxonomy-systematics/host-parasites/index.html;
Holt, B. G. et al. 2013. An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. — Science 339: 74-78. doi:10.1126/science.1228282;
Wells, K. et al. (2018). Global spread of helminth parasites at the human – domestic animal – wildlife interface. — Global Change Biology 24: 3254-3265. doi:10.1111/gcb.14064;
data_global.helminths_mammal.csv