Close to the edge: Spatial variation in plant diversity, biomass and floral resources in conventional and agri-environment cereal fields
Data files
Jul 16, 2024 version files 35.82 KB
Abstract
Non-crop (segetal) plants in arable systems are commonly perceived simply as “weeds”, i.e. harmful at worst and undesirable at best. The increase in management intensity in European arable systems has vastly reduced the populations of all but the most disturbance-tolerant plant species, negatively impacting the whole agricultural food web. In recent years, efforts have been made to promote agricultural biodiversity through measures such as flower strips and unsprayed field margins. However, studies of their impacts on the arable flora have rarely considered their spatial variation within the crop field. We investigated the spatial distribution of vascular plant species richness and their contribution to the food web via biomass and flower units in conventional and agri-environment cereal fields in six regions of Germany. We studied two types of in-crop measures (extensive cereals without pesticides or fertiliser, and with or without intercropping with flowering species) and one adjacent measure (neighbouring flower strip), recording at 1 m intervals from the field edge to interior. These results were then extrapolated to illustrate the effects of these measures on resource provision at the field scale. Species richness and plant biomass dropped off sharply after the first metre in the conventional treatments, regardless of the adjacent habitat. The “extensive” treatments maintained a much higher level of diversity and resource provision into the field interior. At the field level, this can mean more than sixty-fold difference in provision of flowering resources between conventional management (1900 flower units/ha) and agri-environment measures (127,000 units/ha for extensive cereals).
Synthesis and applications:
The strong edge effects we found in conventional cultivation support the premise that reducing field sizes could play a role in promoting in-crop biodiversity. However, incorporating extensive field margins as an agri-environment measure would be more efficient at maximising diversity of generalists whilst maintaining high yields.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1c59zw44r
Main results are contained in data_sutcliffe_et_al_2024_spatial_variation_cereal_fields. This is vascular plant data collected at increasing distance from the cereal field edge under different management types. Categorisations of the plant species are contained in species_data_sutcliffe_et_al_2024_spatial_variation_cereal_fields.
Data was collected on six farms in Germany in 2021.
Description of the data and file structure
data_sutcliffe_et_al_2024_spatial_variation_cereal_fields
Header | Explanation | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | Level 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
uniq | Unique identifier for each transect section | |||||||
tnum | Numeric version of transect position (metres from field edge) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
transect | Transect position | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T11 | |
farm | Abbreviation of farm identity | Fe | He | Os | Lu | Ri | Zi | |
code | Location of sample according to project coding system | |||||||
date | Date of survey | |||||||
treat2 | Treatment | conv = conventional with grass strip | extn_flower = extensive with flower strip | extn_grass = extensive with grass strip | flst = conventional with flower strip | undr = intercrop | ||
crop | Crop species | Dinkel = Spelt | SG = Spring Barley | Sommerhafer = Spring Oats | WG = Winter Barley | WR = Winter Rye | WW = Winter Wheat | |
covcrop | Estimated coverage of the crop in % | |||||||
bio1 | Biomass in 1m² in g | |||||||
nSOWA | Number of all non-crop species (sown and unsown) in 5 m² | |||||||
cW | Coverage weed species in % |
| fuSAO1 | Number of flower units sown and wild in 1 m² | | | | | | |
| :—– | :——————————————- | :- | :- | :- | :- | :- | :- |
species_data_sutcliffe_et_al_2024_spatial_variation_cereal_fields
Header | Explanation | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Vascular plant species according to Hand et al. 2023 | |||||
n_plots | Number of transect sections in which the species was detected | |||||
p_plot | Percentage of transect sections in which the species was detected | |||||
designation_rev | Categorisation of species | S = sown as part of a flowering seed mixture | O = other not sown wild (spontaneous) species | A = species categorised as “High Nature Value” species for Germany | W = Weed species according to the definition in the paper | C = crop species (as either current crop or volunteer) |
Sharing/Access information
Data were collected exclusively for this project. There is no further repository containing this data.
Code/Software
See Analysis Documentation in the Supporting Information of the publication