Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Protective behaviour or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behaviour of ants

Citation

Módra, Gábor (2021), Protective behaviour or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behaviour of ants, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1zcrjdfqp

Abstract

In the genus Aphaenogaster, workers use tools to transport liquid food to the colony. During this behaviour, ants place or drop various kinds of debris into liquid or soft food and then they carry the food-soaked tools back to the nest. According to some authors, this behaviour is not ‘true’ tool use because it represents two separate processes: a defence response to cover the dangerous liquid and the transport of food. Here, we investigated the debris dropping and retrieving behaviour of the ant Aphaenogaster subterranea to establish which of the two hypotheses is more probable by conducting manipulative experiments. We tested the responses of eight colonies to liquid food (honey-water) and non-food liquids (water) in different distances from the nest and to non-threatening liquids previously covered or presented as small droplets. We also tested whether the nutritional condition of colonies (i.e., starved or satiated) would affect the intensity and rate of debris dropping. Our results were consistent with the tool-using behaviour hypothesis. Firstly, ants clearly differentiated between honey-water and water, and they directed more of their foraging effort towards liquids farther from the nest. Secondly, ants performed object dropping even into liquids that did not pose the danger of drowning or becoming entangled. Lastly, the nutritional condition of colonies had a significant effect on the intensity and rate of object dropping, but in an opposite direction than we expected. Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of A. subterranea is more complex than that predicted by the two-component behaviour hypothesis and deserves to be considered as ‘true’ tool-use.