Increased brain size in humans and other primates is hypothesized to confer cognitive benefits but brings costs associated with growing and maintaining energetically expensive neural tissue. Previous studies have argued that changes in either diet or levels of sociality led to shifts in brain size, but results were equivocal. Here we test these hypotheses using phylogenetic comparative methods designed to jointly account for and estimate the effects of adaptation and phylogeny. Using the largest current sample of primate brain and body sizes with observation error, complemented by newly compiled diet and sociality data, we show that both diet and sociality have influenced the evolution of brain size. Shifting from simple to more complex levels of sociality resulted in relatively larger brains, while shifting to a more folivorous diet led to relatively smaller brains. While our results support the role of sociality, they modify a range of ecological hypotheses centered on the importance of frugivory and instead indicate that digestive costs associated with increased folivory may have resulted in relatively smaller brains.

Data on brain and body size, sociality, and diet were collected from the literature, and species-level measurement error in brain and body size was calculated following Grabowski et al. (2016). Supplementary text includes additional results not included in main article.

Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word - can also be opened with Google Sheets and Google Docs. PDF files can be opened with PDF viewers and with Google Chrome.