Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Data from: Global, satellite-driven estimates of heterotrophic respiration

Citation

Konings, Alexandra G. et al. (2019), Data from: Global, satellite-driven estimates of heterotrophic respiration, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.298rn73

Abstract

While heterotrophic respiration (Rh) makes up about a quarter of gross global terrestrial carbon fluxes, it remains among the least observed carbon fluxes, particularly outside the mid-latitudes. In situ measurements collected in the Soil Respiration Database (SRDB) number only a few hundred worldwide. Similarly, only a single data-driven wall-to-wall estimate of annual average heterotrophic respiration exists, based on bottom-up upscaling of SRDB measurements using an assumed functional form to account for climate variability. In this study, we exploit recent advances in remote sensing of terrestrial carbon fluxes to estimate global variations in heterotrophic respiration in a top-down fashion at monthly temporal resolution and 4x5o spatial resolution. We combine net ecosystem productivity estimates from atmospheric inversions of the NASA Carbon Monitoring System- Flux (CMS-Flux) with an optimally-scaled gross primary productivity dataset based on satellite-observed solar-induced fluorescence variations to estimate total ecosystem respiration as a residual of the terrestrial carbon balance. The ecosystem respiration is then separated into autotrophic and heterotrophic components based on a spatially-varying carbon use efficiency retrieved in a model-data fusion framework (the CARbon DAta MOdel fraMework, CARDAMOM). The resulting dataset is independent of any assumptions about how heterotrophic respiration responds to climate or substrate variations. It estimates an annual average global average heterotrophic respiration flux of 43.6 ± 19.3 Pg C/yr. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses showed that the top-down Rh are more sensitive to the choice of input GPP and NEP datasets than to the assumption of a static CUE value, with the possible exception of the wet tropics. These top-down estimates are compared to bottom-up estimates of annual heterotrophic respiration, with new uncertainty estimates that partially account for sampling and model errors. Top-down heterotrophic respiration estimates are higher than those from bottom-up upscaling everywhere except at high latitudes, and are 30% greater overall (43.6 Pg C/yr vs. 33.4 Pg C/yr). The uncertainty ranges of both methods are comparable, except poleward of 45 degrees North, where bottom-up uncertainties are greater. The ratio of top-down heterotrophic to total ecosystem respiration varies seasonally by as much as 0.6 depending on season and climate, illustrating the importance of studying the drivers of autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration separately, and thus the importance of data-driven estimates of Rh such as those estimated here.

Usage Notes

Location

Global