Data from: Further development of the Assessment of Military Multitasking Performance: iterative reliability testing
Data files
Dec 22, 2017 version files 255.98 KB
-
AMMP REDCap data dictionary_DRYAD_16Dec2016.xlsx
16.72 KB
-
Phase Ia_AMMP IRR USARIEM V1 6DEC_2012.xlsx
91.75 KB
-
Phase Ib AMMP IRR USARIEM SALUT_CQ_May 2013.xlsx
19.12 KB
-
Phase II_AMMP Bragg IRR November2013.xlsx
86.10 KB
-
Phase III_FortBragg_IRR Database_Dec2014.xlsx
39.46 KB
-
README_for_AMMP REDCap data dictionary_DRYAD_16Dec2016.txt
566 B
-
README_for_Phase Ia_AMMP IRR USARIEM V1 6DEC_2012.txt
566 B
-
README_for_Phase Ib AMMP IRR USARIEM SALUT_CQ_May 2013.txt
566 B
-
README_for_Phase II_AMMP Bragg IRR November2013.txt
566 B
-
README_for_Phase III_FortBragg_IRR Database_Dec2014.txt
566 B
Abstract
The Assessment of Military Multitasking Performance (AMMP) is a battery of functional dual-tasks and multitasks based on military activities that target known sensorimotor, cognitive, and exertional vulnerabilities after concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The AMMP was developed to help address known limitations in post concussive return to duty assessment and decision making. Once validated, the AMMP is intended for use in combination with other metrics to inform duty-readiness decisions in Active Duty Service Members following concussion. This study used an iterative process of repeated interrater reliability testing and feasibility feedback to drive modifications to the 9 tasks of the original AMMP which resulted in a final version of 6 tasks with metrics that demonstrated clinically acceptable ICCs of > 0.92 (range of 0.92–1.0) for the 3 dual tasks and > 0.87 (range 0.87–1.0) for the metrics of the 3 multitasks. Three metrics involved in recording subject errors across 2 tasks did not achieve ICCs above 0.85 set apriori for multitasks (0.64) and above 0.90 set for dual-tasks (0.77 and 0.86) and were not used for further analysis. This iterative process involved 3 phases of testing with between 13 and 26 subjects, ages 18–42 years, tested in each phase from a combined cohort of healthy controls and Service Members with mTBI. Study findings support continued validation of this assessment tool to provide rehabilitation clinicians further return to duty assessment methods robust to ceiling effects with strong face validity to injured Warriors and their leaders.