Data from: Body condition indices predict reproductive success but not survival in a sedentary, tropical bird
Data files
Aug 24, 2016 version files 349.60 KB
-
2 years data_survival_PCA.csv
5.27 KB
-
2 years data_survival_with HLAllOlya and Time.txt
25.06 KB
-
2 yrs data binomial fledged_31May2013.csv
44.62 KB
-
2 yrs data for PCA 31May2013_use.csv
6.12 KB
-
2 yrs data poisson fledged_31May2013.csv
26.94 KB
-
2 yrs data poisson independent_31May2013.csv
26.95 KB
-
4 years data_survival_PCA.csv
7.14 KB
-
4 years data_survival_with Time.txt
42.41 KB
-
4 yrs data binomial fledged 31May2013.csv
72.91 KB
-
4 yrs data PCA 31May2013.csv
10.23 KB
-
4 yrs data poisson fledged 31May2013.csv
40.10 KB
-
4 yrs data poisson independent 31May2013.csv
41.84 KB
Abstract
Body condition may predict individual fitness because those in better condition have more resources to allocate towards improving their fitness. However, the hypothesis that condition indices are meaningful proxies for fitness has been questioned. Here, we ask if intraspecific variation in condition indices predicts annual reproductive success and survival. We monitored a population of Neochmia phaeton (crimson finch), a sedentary, tropical passerine, for reproductive success and survival over four breeding seasons, and sampled them for commonly used condition indices: mass adjusted for body size, muscle and fat scores, packed cell volume, hemoglobin concentration, total plasma protein, and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio. Our study population is well suited for this research because individuals forage in common areas and do not hold territories such that variation in condition between individuals is not confounded by differences in habitat quality. Furthermore, we controlled for factors that are known to impact condition indices in our study population (e.g., breeding stage) such that we assessed individual condition relative to others in the same context. Condition indices that reflect energy reserves predicted both the probability of an individual fledging young and the number of young produced that survived to independence, but only during some years. Those that were relatively heavy for their body size produced about three times more independent young compared to light individuals. That energy reserves are a meaningful predictor of reproductive success in a sedentary passerine supports the idea that energy reserves are at least sometimes predictors of fitness. However, hematological indices failed to predict reproductive success and none of the indices predicted survival. Therefore, some but not all condition indices may be informative, but because we found that most indices did not predict any component of fitness, we question the ubiquitous interpretation of condition indices as surrogates for individual quality and fitness.