Data from: Persistent species relationships characterize migrating bird communities across stopover sites and seasons
Data files
Feb 03, 2025 version files 707.33 KB
-
BBBO_fall_adj.csv
21.35 KB
-
BBBO_fall_GAI_centered.csv
46.20 KB
-
BBBO_spring_adj.csv
25.10 KB
-
BBBO_spring_GAI_centered.csv
46.08 KB
-
BULA_fall_adj.csv
34.20 KB
-
BULA_fall_GAI_centered.csv
46.20 KB
-
BWATER_fall_adj.csv
33.90 KB
-
BWATER_fall_GAI_centered.csv
46.23 KB
-
BWATER_spring_adj.csv
37.29 KB
-
BWATER_spring_GAI_centered.csv
46.46 KB
-
CUT_fall_adj.csv
41.33 KB
-
CUT_fall_GAI_centered.csv
46.14 KB
-
CUT_spring_adj.csv
36.92 KB
-
CUT_spring_GAI_centered.csv
46.24 KB
-
PARC_fall_adj.csv
40.27 KB
-
PARC_fall_GAI_centered.csv
46.32 KB
-
PARC_spring_adj.csv
17.48 KB
-
PARC_spring_GAI_centered.csv
46.17 KB
-
README.md
3.45 KB
Abstract
Global migrations of diverse animal species often converge along the same routes, bringing together seasonal assemblages of animals that may compete, prey on each other, and share information or pathogens. These interspecific interactions, when energetic demands are high and time to complete journeys is short, may influence survival, migratory success, stopover ecology, and migratory routes. Numerous accounts suggest interspecific co-migrations are globally distributed in aerial, aquatic, and terrestrial systems, although the study of migration to date has rarely investigated species interactions among migrating animals. Here we test the hypothesis that migrating animals are communities engaged in networks of ecological interactions. We leverage over half a million records of 50 bird species from five bird banding sites collected over 8-23 years to test for species associations using social network analyses. We find strong support for persistent species relationships across sites and between spring and fall migration. These relationships may be ecologically meaningful: they are often stronger among phylogenetically related species with similar foraging behaviors and non-breeding ranges even after accounting for the non-social contributions to associations, including overlap in migration timing and habitat use. While interspecific interactions could result in costly competition or beneficial information exchange, we find relationships are largely positive, suggesting limited competitive exclusion at the scale of a banding station during migratory stopovers. Our findings support an understanding of animal migrations that consist of networked communities rather than random assemblages of independently migrating species, encouraging future studies of the nature and consequences of co-migrant interactions.
README: Persistent species relationships characterize migrating bird communities across stopover sites and seasons
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3xsj3txqp
This dataset includes matrices of pairwise species associations and affiliation indices during spring and fall migration at five different bird banding sites.
Description of the data and file structure
The names of the csv files indicate the site (BBBO = Braddock Bay Bird Observatory, BULA = Burke Lake Banding Station, BWATER = Breakwater, CUT = Old Cut, PARC = Powdermill Avian Research Center), the migratory season (spring or fall), and whether the matrix consists of species associations ("adj") or affiliation indices ("GAI"). The affiliation indices are center-scaled to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, so their file name includes "centered." See the manuscript for more details, but essentially, the species associations represent the probability that individuals of two different species are captured in the same mist net during the same 20-45 min interval. The species affiliation indices represent the relative strength of the species association after accounting for similarities in migrating timing, stopover habitat use, and species abundance, and thus are more likely reflective of social relationships.
Each csv file is structured as a matrix. The column and row IDs are the four-letter alpha codes for North American birds. (See below for the common names associated with each of these codes.) The species included in each matrix differ across sites and seasons.
Because we did not calculate or analyze intra-specific relationships, the diagonals of all matrices are "NA."
The common names of the bird species are as follows:
ACFL: Acadian flycatcher
AMRE: American redstart
AMWO: American woodcock
ATSP: American tree sparrow
BAOR: Baltimore oriole
BAWW: Black-and-white warbler
BBWA: Bay-breasted warbler
BGGN: Blue-gray gnatcatcher
BHVI: Blue-headed vireo
BLBW: Blackburnian warbler
BLPW: Blackpoll warbler
BRCR: Brown creeper
BRTH: Brown thrasher
BTBW: Black-throated blue warbler
BTNW: Black-throated green warbler
BWWA: Blue-winged warbler
CAWA: Canada warbler
CHSP: Chipping sparrow
CMWA: Cape May warbler
CONW: Connecticut warbler
COYE: Common yellowthroat
CSWA: Chestnut-sided warbler
DEJU: Dark-eyed junco
EAPH: Eastern phoebe
EATO: Eastern towhee
EAWP: Eastern wood-pewee
FISP: Field sparrow
FOSP: Fox sparrow
GCFL: Great crested flycatcher
GCKI: Golden-crowned kinglet
GCTH: Gray-cheeked thrush
GRCA: Gray catbird
HETH: Hermit thrush
HOWA: Hooded warbler
HOWR: House wren
INBU: Indigo bunting
KEWA: Kentucky warbler
LEFL: Least flycatcher
MAWA: Magnolia warbler
MOWA: Mourning warbler
MYWA: Myrtle warbler
NAWA: Nashville warbler
NOPA: Northern parula
NOWA: Northern waterthrush
OCWA: Orange-crowned warbler
OVEN: Ovenbird
PISI: Pine siskin
PHVI: Philadelphia vireo
PUFI: Purple finch
RBGR: Rose-breasted grosbeak
RBNU: Red-breasted nuthatch
RCKI: Ruby-crowned kinglet
REVI: Red-eyed vireo
RWBL: Red-winged blackbird
RUBL: Rusty blackbird
SCTA: Scarlet tanager
SWSP: Swamp sparrow
SWTH: Swainson's thrush
TEWA: Tennessee warbler
TRES: Tree swallow
TRFL: Traill's flycatcher
VEER: Veery
WAVI: Warbling vireo
WCSP: White-crowned sparrow
WIWA: Wilson's warbler
WIWR: Winter wren
WOTH: Wood thrush
WPWA: Western palm warbler
WTSP: White-throated sparrow
YBFL: Yellow-bellied flycatcher
YEWA: Yellow warbler