Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Data from: The influence of geomorphic processes on plant distribution and abundance as reflected in plant tolerance curves

Citation

Chase, Marianne N.; Johnson, Edward A.; Martin, Yvonne E. (2012), Data from: The influence of geomorphic processes on plant distribution and abundance as reflected in plant tolerance curves, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4pf4t

Abstract

Ecologists describe plant distribution using direct gradient analysis, by which a tolerance curve of species abundance is described along an environmental gradient (any environmental variable that affects plant distribution). Soil moisture is generally the gradient in low relief areas that explains the most variation. Traditional direct gradient analyses have used terrain structure (i.e. transects up or down hillslopes) as a correlate to soil moisture. Here we use a numerical tectonic and geomorphic process-based landscape development model to create two landscapes with different geomorphic characteristics (i) to demonstrate the influence of geomorphic processes on soil moisture patterns and plant distribution and (ii) to evaluate the effectiveness of transects in describing moisture gradients and tolerance curves on landscapes dominated by creep or overland flow. We use a topographic index to approximate the distribution of soil moisture as it is determined by the shape of these different landscapes. Transects are placed on hillslopes in each model landscape and used to construct tolerance curves. Results show that transect methods that use the distance from the channel to the ridgeline as an approximation of soil moisture create variable tolerance curves for the same plant both within a single landscape and between different landscapes. The reason for these differences is that transects do not take into account the 3-dimensional landscape form that explains water movement. Landscapes have regions of convexity and flow path divergence and regions of concavity and flow path convergence which, along with hillslope length, determine contributing area. In addition, hillslope curvature results in varying capacities to retain water. However, when the topographic index is used instead of hillslope transect position, tolerance curves from the same and different landscapes reflect the differences the topographic structure has on soil moisture. We thus show that traditional methods of direct gradient analysis are not always adequate as they do not tend to consider that soil moisture depends on hillslope length, curvature, and slope. Furthermore, we show that within and between landscapes there are differences in spatial distributions of soil moisture that are reflections of the geomorphic processes that created them.

Usage Notes