This dataset provides the complete list of data and necessary information in order to reproduce all the analyses performed in the paper:
"Mondanaro, A., Di Febbraro, M., Melchionna, M., Maiorano, L., Di Marco, M., Edwards, N.R., Holden, P.B., Castiglione, S., Rook, L., Raia, P. (2021)
The role of habitat fragmentation in Pleistocene megafauna extinction in Eurasia. Ecography, online version"

The idea that than several small, rather than a single large, habitat areas, should hold the highest total species richness (the so-called SLOSS debate) brings into question the importance of habitat fragmentation to extinction risk. SLOSS studies are generally addressed over a short time scale, potentially ignoring the long-term dimension of extinction risk. Here, we provide the first long-term evaluation of the role of habitat fragmentation in species extinction, focusing on 22 large mammal species that lived in Eurasia during the last 200,000 years. By combining species distribution models and landscape pattern analysis, we compared temporal dynamics of habitat spatial structure between extinct and extant species, estimating size, number, and degree of geographical isolation of their suitable habitat patches. Our results evidenced that extinct mammals went through considerable habitat fragmentation during the last glacial period and started to fare worse than extant species from about 50 ka. In particular, our modelling effort constrains the fragmentation of habitats into a narrow time window, from 46 to 36 kilo years ago, surprisingly coinciding with known extinction dates of several megafauna species. Landscape spatial structure was the second most important driver affecting megafauna extinction risk (ca. 38% importance), after body mass (ca. 39%) and followed by dietary preferences (ca. 20%). Our results indicate a major role played by landscape fragmentation on extinction. Such evidence provides insights on what might likely happen in the future, with climate change, habitat loss, and fragmentation acting as the main forces exerting their negative effects on biodiversity.

species_status.xlsx
        Variable list
        status: species status (i.e. extinct/extant)
        species: taxonomical definition

Traits.xlsx
        Variable list
        Binomial: taxonomical definition
        Mass.g: body mass in grams
        Diet.Graminoids: prevalence of graminoids in the diet of a given species (i.e. from 0 to 3) according to Lundgren et al., Scientific Data, 2021. 
        Diet.Browse.Fruit: prevalence of fruits and browse plants in the diet of a given species (i.e. from 0 to 3) according to Lundgren et al., Scientific Data, 2021.
        Diet.Meat: prevalence of meat in the diet of a given species (i.e. from 0 to 3) according to Lundgren et al., Scientific Data, 2021.