Data from: Sex-linked genomic variation and its relationship to avian plumage dichromatism and sexual selection
Data files
Oct 08, 2015 version files 19.81 GB
-
Archive.zip
-
sp1012.tar.gz
-
sp1013.tar.gz
-
sp1021.tar.gz
-
sp1022.tar.gz
-
sp1023.tar.gz
-
sp1024.tar.gz
-
sp111.tar.gz
-
sp112.tar.gz
-
sp121.tar.gz
-
sp122.tar.gz
-
sp123.tar.gz
-
sp211.tar.gz
-
sp212.tar.gz
-
sp221.tar.gz
-
sp222.tar.gz
-
sp311.tar.gz
-
sp312.tar.gz
-
sp313.tar.gz
-
sp321.tar.gz
-
sp323.tar.gz
-
sp411.tar.gz
-
sp412.tar.gz
-
sp421.tar.gz
-
sp422.tar.gz
-
sp423.tar.gz
-
sp511.tar.gz
-
sp512.tar.gz
-
sp521.tar.gz
-
sp522.tar.gz
-
sp811.tar.gz
-
sp812.tar.gz
-
sp813.tar.gz
-
sp821.tar.gz
-
sp822.tar.gz
-
sp823.tar.gz
-
sp911.tar.gz
-
sp912.tar.gz
-
sp913.tar.gz
-
sp921.tar.gz
-
sp922.tar.gz
-
sp923.tar.gz
Abstract
Background: Sexual dichromatism is the tendency for sexes to differ in color pattern and represents a striking form of within-species morphological variation. Conspicuous intersexual differences in avian plumage are generally thought to result from Darwinian sexual selection, to the extent that dichromatism is often treated as a surrogate for the intensity of sexual selection in phylogenetic comparative studies. Intense sexual selection is predicted to leave a footprint on genetic evolution by reducing the relative genetic diversity on sex chromosome to that on the autosomes. Results: In this study, we test the association between plumage dichromatism and sex-linked genetic diversity using eight species pairs with contrasting levels of dichromatism. We estimated Z-linked and autosomal genetic diversity for these non-model avian species using restriction-site associated (RAD) loci that covered ~3 % of the genome. We find that monochromatic birds consistently have reduced sex-linked genomic variation relative to phylogenetically-paired dichromatic species and this pattern is robust to mutational biases. Conclusions: Our results are consistent with several interpretations. If present-day sexual selection is stronger in dichromatic birds, our results suggest that its impact on sex-linked genomic variation is offset by other processes that lead to proportionately lower Z-linked variation in monochromatic species. We discuss possible factors that may contribute to this discrepancy between phenotypes and genomic variation. Conversely, it is possible that present-day sexual selection -- as measured by the variance in male reproductive success -- is stronger in the set of monochromatic taxa we have examined, potentially reflecting the importance of song, behavior and other non-plumage associated traits as targets of sexual selection. This counterintuitive finding suggests that the relationship between genomic variation and sexual selection is complex and highlights the need for a more comprehensive survey of genomic variation in avian taxa that vary markedly in social and genetic mating systems.