Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: not enough time: short-term female presence after oviposition does not improve egg survival in the Emerald glass frog

Data files

Apr 25, 2024 version files 27.60 KB

Abstract

In species exhibiting egg attendance, parents remain with their eggs, protecting them against harsh abiotic conditions, such as dehydration or drowning, and biotic conditions, such as predation, parasitism, and diseases. This form of post-oviposition parental care is widely observed in animals, including amphibians. Long-term egg attendance (spanning several days) is common among glass frogs, and removal experiments have demonstrated the critical role of the parent, whether male or female, in increasing egg survival. However, in a few glass frog species, females stay close to their eggs for less than three hours after oviposition. Previous studies have found that maternal presence reduces dehydration and predation despite the short duration of this attendance behavior. In the glass frog Espadarana prosoblepon, females remain close to their eggs for less than 1.5 hours after oviposition. Given that the embryonic development period in this species spans an average of 25 days, our main question was whether remaining with the clutch for only 0.15% of this time is sufficient to increase egg survival. To address this question, we conducted a female removal experiment in semi-captivity and found no evidence that female presence improves egg hydration after oviposition. In a maternal commitment behavioral assay, most females promptly abandoned their clutches when subjected to a gentle disturbance and did not return to them. Lastly, a female removal experiment under field conditions revealed that clutches with or without mothers experienced similar levels of mortality, primarily caused by invertebrate predators. Through a series of experimental assays, we demonstrate that the short-term female presence in E. prosoblepon does not increase egg survival. Therefore, we argue that the post-oviposition behavior observed in this species cannot be considered parental care behavior. Our findings challenge the assumption that the proximity of parents and their eggs is an unequivocal indicator of parental care.