Data from: Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana
Cite this dataset
Veltsos, Paris et al. (2012). Data from: Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6df154sg
Sexual selection has the potential to contribute to population divergence and speciation. Most studies of sexual selection in Drosophila have concentrated on a single signaling modality, usually either courtship song or cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), which can act as contact pheromones. We have examined the relationship between both signal types and reproductive success using F1-3 offspring of wild-collected flies, raised in the lab. We used two populations of the Holarctic species Drosophila montana, that represent different phylogeographic clades which have been separate for ca. 0.5 MY, and which differ to some extent in both traits. Here we characterise the nature and identify the targets of sexual selection on song, CHCs and both traits combined within the populations. Three measures of courtship outcome were used as fitness proxies. They were the probability of mating, mating latency and the production of rejection song by females and showed patterns of association with different traits that included both linear and quadratic selection. Courtship song predicted courtship outcome better than CHCs and the signal modalities acted in an additive rather than synergistic manner. Selection was generally consistent in direction and strength between the two populations and favoured males that sang more vigorously. Sexual selection differed in the extent, strength and nature on some of the traits between populations. However, the differences in the directionality of selection detected were not a good predictor of population differences. In addition, a character previously shown to be important for species recognition, interpulse interval, was found to be under sexual selection. Our results highlight the complexity of understanding the relationship between within-population sexual selection and population differences. Sexual selection alone cannot predict differences between populations.