In silico subcellular targeting predictions for cytosolic aminoacyl tRNA-synthetases (aaRS) in parasitic plants
Data files
Aug 02, 2023 version files 776.54 KB
-
20230315_PresenceAbsencematrix.csv
-
20230329_orthogroups_geneID_editforheatmaps.csv
-
20230329_orthogroups_geneID.csv
-
input_prot_fasta.zip
-
README.md
-
Subcellular_Predictions.zip
Abstract
Eukaryotic nuclear genomes often encode distinct sets of protein translation machinery for function in the cytosol vs. organelles (mitochondria and plastids). This phenomenon raises questions about why multiple translation systems are maintained even though they are capable of comparable functions, and whether they evolve differently depending on the compartment where they operate. These questions are particularly interesting in land plants because translation machinery, including aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS), is often dual-targeted to both the plastids and mitochondria. These two organelles have quite different metabolisms, with much higher rates of translation in plastids to supply the abundant, rapid-turnover proteins required for photosynthesis. Previous studies have indicated that plant organellar aaRS evolve more slowly compared to mitochondrial aaRS in other eukaryotes that lack plastids. Thus, we investigated the evolution of nuclear-encoded organellar and cytosolic translation machinery across a broad sampling of angiosperms, including non-photosynthetic (heterotrophic) plant species with reduced rates of plastid gene expression to test the hypothesis that translational demands associated with photosynthesis constrain the evolution of bacterial-like enzymes involved in organellar tRNA metabolism. Remarkably, heterotrophic plants exhibited wholesale loss of many organelle-targeted aaRS and other enzymes, even though translation still occurs in their mitochondria and plastids. These losses were often accompanied by apparent retargeting of cytosolic enzymes and tRNAs to the organelles, sometimes preserving aaRS-tRNA charging relationships but other times creating surprising mismatches between cytosolic aaRS and mitochondrial tRNA substrates. Our findings indicate that the presence of a photosynthetic plastid drives the retention of specialized systems for organellar tRNA metabolism.
Methods
Subcellular predictions generated from in silico prediction programs TargetP2.0 (Armenteros et al 2019) and LOCALIZER (Sperschneider et al 2017). Included also are input sequences for aaRS and other enzymes used for predictions, which were pulled from publically available sequence data. Included are scripts and metadata files for reproducing results if desired.
Usage notes
MEGA11 to look at all multiple sequence alignments.
Jupyter Notebooks, Rstudio are needed to look at scripts.
Running scripts/analysis requires dependencies described in README.md