Meta-analysis of phenotypic plasticity in response to thermal treatments in invertebrates
Data files
Mar 30, 2022 version files 1.99 MB
-
cold_tree.tre
858 B
-
ColdPW.csv
76.97 KB
-
ColdX.csv
39.94 KB
-
development_tree.tre
1.48 KB
-
DevPW.csv
340.35 KB
-
DevX.csv
88.92 KB
-
genexp_tree.tre
253 B
-
GenexpPW.csv
179.09 KB
-
GenexpX.csv
47.77 KB
-
heat_tree.tre
536 B
-
HeatPW.csv
67.44 KB
-
HeatX.csv
40.12 KB
-
longevity_tree.tre
2 KB
-
LongPW.csv
436.18 KB
-
LongX.csv
106.53 KB
-
README_for_data_files_and_R_code.txt
3.72 KB
-
size_tree.tre
1.18 KB
-
SizePW.csv
225.87 KB
-
SizeX.csv
81.42 KB
-
survival_tree.tre
800 B
-
SurvPW.csv
174.76 KB
-
SurvX.csv
70.95 KB
Abstract
Populations must adapt to environmental changes to remain viable. Both evolution and phenotypic plasticity contribute to adaptation, with plasticity possibly being more important for coping with rapid change. Adaptation is complex in species with separate sexes, as the sexes can differ in the strength or direction of natural selection, the genetic basis of trait variation, and phenotypic plasticity. Many species show sex differences in plasticity, yet how these differences influence extinction susceptibility remains unclear. We first extend theoretical models of population persistence in changing environments and show that persistence is affected by sexual dimorphism for phenotypic plasticity, trait genetic architecture, and sex-specific selection. Our models predict that female-biased adaptive plasticity—particularly in traits with modest-to-low cross-sex genetic correlations— typically promotes persistence, though we also identify conditions where sexually monomorphic or male-biased plasticity promotes persistence. We then perform a meta-analysis of sex-specific plasticity under manipulated thermal conditions. Although examples of sexually dimorphic plasticity are widely observed, systematic sex differences are rare. An exception—cold resistance—is systematically female-biased and represents a trait wherein sexually dimorphic plasticity might elevate population viability in changing environments. We discuss our results in light of debates about the roles of evolution and plasticity in extinction susceptibility.