Data from: Behaviour-specific spatiotemporal patterns of habitat use by sea turtles revealed using biologging and supervised machine learning
Data files
May 19, 2023 version files 2.41 MB
-
1._Hounslow_BRTs_GLMMs.R
-
2._Hounslow_Dive_Geolocation_KUD.R
-
DF.csv
-
Foraging.zip
-
README.md
-
Resting.zip
Abstract
- Conservation of threatened species and anthropogenic threat mitigation commonly rely on spatially managed areas selected according to habitat preference. Since the impact of threats can be behaviour-specific, such information could be incorporated into spatial management to improve conservation outcomes. However, collecting spatially explicit behavioural data is challenging.
- Using multi-sensor biologging tags containing high-resolution movement sensors (e.g., accelerometer, magnetometer, GPS) and animal-borne video cameras, combined with supervised machine learning, we developed a method to automatically identify and geolocate typically ambiguous behaviours for the poorly understood flatback turtle Natator depressus. Subsequently, we evaluated behaviour-specific spatiotemporal patterns of habitat use.
- Boosted regression trees successfully identified the presence of foraging and resting in 7074 dives (AUC > 0.9), using dive features representing characteristics of locomotory activity, body posture, and three-dimensional dive paths validated by ancillary video data. Foraging was characterised by dives with longer duration, variable depth, tortuous bottom phases; resting was characterised by dives with decreased locomotory activity and longer duration bottom phases.
- Foraging and resting showed minimal spatial segregation based on 50% and 95% utilisation distributions. Expected diel patterns of behaviour-specific habitat use were superseded by the extreme tides at the near-shore study site. Turtles rested in areas close to the subtidal and intertidal boundary within larger overlapping foraging areas, allowing efficient access to intertidal food resources upon inundation at high tides when foraging was ~25% more likely.
- Synthesis and applications: Using supervised machine learning and biologging tools, we show the potential for dynamic spatial management of flatback turtles to mitigate behaviour-specific threats by prioritising protection of important locations at pertinent times. Although results are a species-specific response to a super-tidal environment, our approach can be generalised to a broad range of taxa and study systems, facilitating a conceptual advance in spatial management.
Methods
Flatback turtles at Yawuru Nagulagun Roebuck Bay, Western Australia were captured at sea and equipped with a CATS tag (Camera or Diary) multisensor biologging tag for up to 1 week, from 2018–2021. Data have been pre-processed into dives and their dive features, temporal covariates and observed behaviours according to methods in the main manuscript and Hounslow JL, Fossette S, Byrnes EE, Whiting SD, Lambourne RN, Armstrong NJ, Tucker AD, Richardson AR, Gleiss AC (2022) Multivariate analysis of biologging data reveals the environmental determinants of diving behaviour in a marine reptile. Royal Society Open Science 9:211860.
Usage notes
DF.csv can be opened with any text editor (e.g MS Excel, UltraEdit).
R Files can be read into the R statistical software (version 4.0.3 or later), available at https://www.r-project.org/
Shapefiles can be opened in R, QGIS, ArcGIS etc.