Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Data from: Modelling species distributions limited by geographic barriers: a case study with African and American primates

Citation

Aliaga-Samanez, Alisa; Real, Raimundo; Vermeer, Jan; Olivero, Jesús (2020), Data from: Modelling species distributions limited by geographic barriers: a case study with African and American primates, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8pk0p2nj0

Abstract

Aim: The boundaries of species distributions are often shaped by natural barriers such as mountains and rivers, but species distribution models usually fail to include these constraints. We tested several approaches that include barriers as explanatory variables in species distribution models.

Location: Africa and South America.

Time period: Current

Major taxa studied: Primates

Methods: We modelled the ranges of pairs of species separated by a river taking into account three explanatory components: the environment (ecosystems, topo-hydrography, climate, human pressure), the spatial structure shaped by history and population dynamics (using a trend-surface approach), and rivers as naturals barriers to dispersal (using a binary cis-trans variable that describes both sides of the river). To assess how the addition of a spatial structure and the barrier could improve distribution models, we used a nested approach by comparing models based on: a) the environment; b) the environment and the spatial structure; and c) the environment, the spatial structure and the river. These models were constructed using the favourability functions.

Results: There was a decreased occurrence of high-favourability values in the opposite side of the rivers in models that included the spatial structure of distributions, compared to models based on environment alone. This decrease was more marked when the description of the spatial structure was made more flexible. However, model performance was significantly improved by the inclusion of cis-trans variables that identified areas on the opposite side as totally unfavourable.

Main conclusions: The performance of distribution models can improve by the use of approaches that describe barriers. Although adding the location of geographic units in relation to a river appears to be the most accurate way to define the presence of a barrier, defining this variable may be challenging. A suitable alternative is to analyse the spatial structure of distributions using a flexible approach.