Data from: Reporting guidelines for community-based participatory research (CBPR) did not improve the reporting quality of published studies: a systematic review of studies on smoking cessation

Kato, Daisuke, Mie University, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2449-0548

Kataoka, Yuki, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki Hospital

Suwangto, Erfen, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia

Kaneko, Makoto, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine

Wakabayashi, Hideki, Mie University

Son, Daisuke, University of Tokyo

Kawachi, Ichiro, Harvard University

d.kato0417@gmail.com, youkiti@gmail.com, erfen_gs@yahoo.co.id, makotokaneko0314@gmail.com, hidekiw927@gmail.com, sondtky@gmail.com, ikawachi@hsph.harvard.edu

Published Nov 06, 2020 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bcc2fqz7z

Cite this dataset

Kato, Daisuke et al. (2020). Data from: Reporting guidelines for community-based participatory research (CBPR) did not improve the reporting quality of published studies: a systematic review of studies on smoking cessation [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bcc2fqz7z

Abstract

Although a guideline for reporting the results of community-based participatory research (CBPR) was published in 2010, the impact on the quality of reporting a CBPR on smoking cessation is unknown. Here we provide the raw data of a systematic review that assessed the impact of a 2010 community-based participatory research reporting guideline. on the quality of reporting a CBPR on smoking cessation. Specifically, we searched the MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases and included articles published up to October 2018 (PROSPERO: CRD42019111668). We assessed reporting quality using a 13-item checklist.

Funding

Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center