Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Response of vegetation to coffee pulp addition

Citation

Cole, Rebecca; Zahawi, Rakan (2021), Response of vegetation to coffee pulp addition, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bvq83bk86

Abstract

Applying nutrient-rich agricultural by-products, such as fruit peels and pulp, to degraded land has been proposed as a strategy to overcome a number of barriers to tropical forest recovery. While such linkages between agroindustry and restoration represent win-win scenarios, practical applications remain largely unexplored. In this case study, we tested coffee pulp as an amendment to catalyze forest succession on post-agricultural land in southern Costa Rica.

A 0.5-m-deep layer of coffee pulp was deposited across a 35 × 40-m area and an adjacent similar-sized control plot (no coffee pulp addition) was delineated. Over two years, we measured changes in soil nutrients, ground cover, understory vegetation, tree establishment, and canopy cover across both coffee pulp and control treatments.

Our results show that soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous were significantly elevated in the coffee pulp compared to control treatment after two years. Coffee pulp addition significantly altered the ground cover characteristics, eliminating pasture grasses, facilitating establishment of herbaceous plants, and increasing the percent area covered by leaf litter.

Early-successional trees and shrubs established quickly in coffee pulp treatment, reaching 30-fold greater mean basal area and 20-fold greater woody stem density (>1-cm-dbh) compared to the control treatment. Structural metrics showed 4-fold greater mean canopy height in the coffee pulp compared to control treatment and >80% canopy cover overall. Canopy height >5 m was ~40% in the coffee pulp but was negligible in the control treatment.

Our study highlights the significant potential for using agricultural waste, like coffee pulp, to jump start forest succession on degraded tropical lands and encourages further research to optimize linkages between agroindustry and restoration.

Funding

March Conservation Fund

March Conservation Fund