Data from: Individual, population, and ecosystem effects of hypoxia on a dominant benthic bivalve in Chesapeake Bay
Data files
Sep 06, 2013 version files 430.94 KB
-
Field predation and non-predatory mortality rates.csv
2.67 KB
-
Field predation experiment DO Datasond.csv
246.32 KB
-
Field predation sites and physical measurements.csv
5.07 KB
-
Lab experiment DO and temp.csv
29.33 KB
-
Macoma balthic densities.csv
7.76 KB
-
Macoma balthic lengths and masses.csv
34.20 KB
-
Macoma balthic recruits.csv
823 B
-
Macoma balthic shell lengths.csv
64.13 KB
-
Macoma balthica survival.csv
1.45 KB
-
mb-HSP70 and fecundity.csv
1.79 KB
-
mb-HSP70 and protein in eggs.csv
509 B
-
README_for_Field predation and non-predatory mortality rates.txt
881 B
-
README_for_Field predation experiment DO Datasond.txt
673 B
-
README_for_Field predation sites and physical measurements.txt
745 B
-
README_for_Lab experiment DO and temp.txt
838 B
-
README_for_Macoma balthic densities.txt
1.03 KB
-
README_for_Macoma balthic lengths and masses.txt
923 B
-
README_for_Macoma balthic recruits.txt
916 B
-
README_for_Macoma balthic shell lengths.txt
870 B
-
README_for_Macoma balthica survival.txt
1.08 KB
-
README_for_mb-HSP70 and fecundity.txt
902 B
-
README_for_mb-HSP70 and protein in eggs.txt
742 B
-
README_for_Sites and physical measurements 2003.txt
762 B
-
README_for_Sites and physical measurements 2004.txt
765 B
-
Sites and physical measurements 2003.csv
8.54 KB
-
Sites and physical measurements 2004.csv
17.20 KB
Abstract
Hypoxia is an environmental stressor that affects abundance, biomass, diversity and ecosystem function of benthic assemblages worldwide, yet its collective impact at individual, population, and ecosystem levels has rarely been investigated. We examined the effects of hypoxia on the biomass-dominant clam, Macoma balthica, in the York and Rappahannock Rivers (Chesapeake Bay, USA). We (i) surveyed the M. balthica populations in both rivers in 2003 and 2004, (ii) determined the effects of low DO on M. balthica fecundity in a laboratory experiment, and (iii) employed a predator-exclusion field experiment to establish the effects of hypoxia and prey density on predation upon M. balthica. The resultant data were used to parameterize a matrix model, which was analyzed to define potential effects of hypoxia at the population level. In both rivers, hypoxia decreased individual clam growth and caused local extinction of populations. Hypoxia reduced egg production of M. balthica by 40% and increased protein investment per egg. In the predator-exclusion field experiment, hypoxia magnified predation rates three-fold and altered the functional response of predators to M. balthica from a stabilizing type III functional response to a destabilizing type II functional response. In a density-independent matrix model, hypoxia resulted in coupled source-sink metapopulation dynamics, with hypoxic areas acting as black-hole sinks. Increases in the spatial and temporal extent of hypoxia caused the populations to decline toward extinction. In a second model that incorporated density-dependence, under mild hypoxic conditions trophic transfer from M. balthica to predators increased, but at increased spatial or temporal extent of hypoxia trophic transfer decreased. The major decline in trophic transfer to predators under severe hypoxia resulted from diversion of M. balthica biomass into the microbial loop. Our model predicted that there are multiple stable states for M. balthica populations (high and very low densities), such that the saddle point (threshold at which the population switches from one state to the other) increased and resilience decreased with the spatial extent of hypoxia. We underscore how effects of a stressor at the individual level can combine to have substantial population and ecosystem-level effects.
- Long, W. Christopher; Seitz, Rochelle D.; Brylawski, Bryce J.; Lipcius, Romuald N. (2014), Individual, population, and ecosystem effects of hypoxia on a dominant benthic bivalve in Chesapeake Bay, Ecological Monographs, Article-journal, https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0440.1
