Why signal if you are not attractive? Courtship synchrony in a fiddler crab
Data files
Jul 05, 2021 version files 26.70 KB
-
crab_data.xlsx
Abstract
Synchronised male courtship signals are puzzling because males generally compete with each other for females. Male Austruca mjoebergi fiddler crabs wave in synchrony to attract females, but, all else being equal, females have a strong preference for ‘leader’ males that can produce waves before other males (‘followers’). So why do followers participate in synchrony? Here, we experimentally investigate three explanations for why followers might wave in synchrony: 1) followers obtain a small proportion of matings, 2) followers are more likely than a leader to attract females if they are positioned closer to her than is the leader, and 3) synchrony functions as a long-distance visual signal that attracts females so there is a net benefit to synchrony for all males. Using robotic male crabs, we found that females show a strong preference for leading males, but followers obtain a ‘better-than-nothing’ proportion of mates. We also showed that closer proximity of a follower to the female did not affect her preference for leaders, although being a leader increased a male’s success when he was further from the female than were rival males. Finally, females were more likely to approach a distant group if there was a leader present, suggesting that followers do benefit from participating in synchrony.
Methods
Data was collected in the field using wild-caught female Austruca mjoebergi fiddler crabs and robotic crabs mimicking male A. mjoebergi crabs.
For experiments 1-2, we conducted female mate choice trials and recorded female preferences for individual robotic male crabs based on their wave timing role (i.e. leader or follower).
For experiment 3, we recorded whether females approached a group of males based on 1) her distance from the group and 2) the wave rhythm of the group of males (synchrony, asynchrony or leader-follower).
Provided dataset is the raw data collected from the field. For more detailed experimental methods, please see the Methods section of the research article.
Usage notes
Meta-data:
Column name / Variable description
Trial_No / if a female did not respond, we tested female preferences up to three times before excluding her.
Female_Size / in mm; carapace width
Female_Preference / which robocrab the female chose (number of robocrab)
Pref_Robocrab_Role / what was the wave timing of the female's preferred robocrab? Leader, Follower or Far Follower (Experiment 2 only)
Success / binary success of each trial where 1 = female chose leader/far follower and 0 = female chose follower
Time / in seconds; time to choice
Female_status / whether a female was actively mate-searching or whether she was burrowless (we did not observe her mate-searching)