Hydrological connectivity and local environment alternately drive spatial structure of floodplain aquatic community across season
Data files
Jan 24, 2025 version files 31.45 KB
-
2021onlyseasonalUryu_comm_update2.csv
21.76 KB
-
2021seasonalUryu_chemistryFINAL.csv
5.49 KB
-
2021seasonalUryu_connectivityFINAL.csv
1.36 KB
-
README.md
2.83 KB
Abstract
Seasonal changes in the environment often strongly influence biological communities. In environmental transition zones, or ecotone, the environment fluctuates over time between two different types of environments, and the seasonal change is more pronounced. Although emphasis has been placed on the spatial variation of biota along environmental gradients, seasonal change has not been well studied despite the seasonal nature of many ecotones. In this study, we investigated seasonal shift in aquatic community structures of floodplain waterbodies characterized as transitions between lotic and lentic environments, and further investigated the biological processes behind the shift. We observed a clear seasonal shift of community structure in floodplain waterbodies. From the spring snowmelt season to the summer low flow season, the aquatic community structure was largely driven by the hydrological connectivity to the river, represented as the timing of the lotic-lentic transition during the seasonal flood recession. In contrast, after a few months of summer low flow period, the effect weakened over time, and the communities were structured based more on the basis of the local environment. The seasonal shift was largely explained by the change in amphibian and aquatic insect larvae, the main members of the floodplain aquatic assemblage, which metamorphose and emerge from the water during the summer period and then re-distribute in different ways more strongly influenced by local environmental factors such as water body size, temperature, and dissolved oxygen levels. Given that biota in ecotones occupy the habitat for a limited time due to the severe environmental fluctuations, such seasonal changes as we observed in this study may be widespread in ecotones. Landscape and local environmental conditions could alternately shape community structures in different seasons. Further attention to the temporal aspects of community structure is needed for community studies as well as for conservation.
README: Hydrological connectivity and local environment alternately drive spatial structure of floodplain aquatic community across season
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gmsbcc2xh
Description of the data and file structure
In this study, in a floodplain of Butokamabetsu-river, Horokanai, Hokkaido in Japan, we investigated aquatic biota in 25 waterbodies with different hydrological connectivity to a river in three seasons. The data is analyzed and published in the following paper.
Hiromi Uno, Shunsuke Utsumi, Kentaro Morita, Osamu Kishida, Md. Khorshed Alam, Junjiro Negishi (2025) Hydrological connectivity and local environment alternately drive spatial structure of floodplain aquatic community across season. Ecology and Evolution.
"2021onlyseasonalUryu_comm_update2.csv" file includes all the community data described in this paper: Each column represents a taxon including amphibian, fish, benthic macroinvertebrate, and plankton, and each row represents a sampling event data from a site in one season. The number indicate the density of each taxa at each sampling event. The methods of the sampling is described in the paper.
Unit is as follows;
Fish: individuals m-2
Amphibian: presence=1, absence=0
Benthos: individuals m-2
Plankton: individuals L-1
"2021seasonalUryu_connectivityFINAL.csv" file includes surface hydrological connectivity of each site to the mainstem river. The methods of the sampling is described in the paper.
Distance: river distance from the outlet of the river to the lake. (meter)
organic_mm: thickness of the organic layer at the bottom (mm)
Substrate: substrate at the bottom
Grainsize: (mm)
Juliandate_lastsnowflow: Julian date when the river water by the snowmelt flood stopped flowing into the site
conn_order: order of the connectivity. "1" represents the site with the highest connectivity.
conn_easy2: connectivity category used in the paper
conn_easy2_num: connectivity category as number (1=none, 2=overflow2, 3=overflow1, 4=flowing)
side_inflow: presence of flow input from side (tributuary)
flow: presence of flow at the time of sampling
"2021seasonalUryu_chemistryFINAL.csv" file includes environmental variable such as pH, DO, temperature etc, measured at each sampling event at each site. The methods of the sampling is described in the paper.
PH: pH
COND: conductivity (mS m-1)
DO_mgL-1: dissolved oxygen (mg L-1)
Temp: water temperature (degree C)
Season: sampling season
Year: year of sampling
total_Area: estimated surface area of the waterbody each site is located (m2)
total_Volume: estimated water volume of the waterbody each site is located (m3)
Flow_cmsec: average flow rate (cm sec-1)
bottom_conn: surface water connectivity to the mainstream river at the downstream end of the waterbody.
Methods
The survey targeted four faunal groups: plankton, benthos, nekton (fishes), and amphibians. Benthic invertebrates were sampled with Surber net samplers (25 cm ´ 25 cm). Three samples were collected at each site on each sampling date and combined. Benthic samples were immediately sieved through a 0.5 mm mesh and preserved in 99% ethanol for later sorting. Fish were captured with a backpack electrofishing unit (Model 12B, Smith-Root Inc., Vancouver, Washington, USA) using a pulsed direct current setting (300–400V, DC). A crew of two or three study participants sampled in an upstream direction. The entire area of small waterbodies or the first 20–120 m of paleo-side channels at the site longer than 120 m were sampled by the two-pass method. All fish collected in the surveys were identified to species and released back to the same site alive. The fish catch per unit effort was calculated by dividing the fish count by the total habitat area sampled. The density of amphibian larvae was binomial (very high or zero), because their presence depend on whether their adults lay egg-mass, which contains many eggs. Therefore, for amphibians, we recorded presence/absence of their larvae rather than their density by visual investigation during the electrofishing survey. For plankton, 10 L of water was filtered through a 70-μm-mesh plankton net and preserved in 2% Glutaraldehyde for zooplankton analysis.