Data from: Colourful urban birds: Urban-tolerant birds have more elaborate colours, more blue and less brown
Data files
Jan 20, 2025 version files 1.06 MB
-
Dataset.2.xlsx
1.06 MB
-
README.md
5.17 KB
Abstract
Urbanization, one of the most extreme and rapidly-expanding human-induced landscape changes, imposes multiple challenges to wildlife. Studies in urban ecology have explored how urbanization affects organisms. However, still little is known about the relationship between urbanization and animal coloration, even though colours fulfil key functions such as camouflage, signalling, and thermoregulation. We use a global bird database on urban tolerance and combine it with quantitative colour estimates to test whether urban-tolerant species differ in colour from less urban-tolerant ones. Our interspecific comparative analyses revealed that urban-tolerant birds are more likely to have blue, dark grey and black colours and less likely to have brown or yellow colours. However, after statistically accounting for phylogenetic relatedness, only the effects of blue and brown colours remained significant. Overall, urban-tolerant species have more elaborated colours, but we found no association between urbanization and sexual dichromatism. Additionally, we performed assemblage-level analyses to test whether urban assemblages are less-colour diverse, a key prediction of the urban colour homogenization hypothesis. Our results did not support this hypothesis: after accounting for species richness, urban bird communities were more, rather than less, colour diverse. Thus, our results suggest that plumage colours are part of an urban-associated syndrome. Cities may select against species with colours that provide camouflage in natural settings, such as brown, because these colours are no longer cryptic in the urban environment. Increased colour elaboration in urban settings may also be related to reduced risk of predation by visual predators. These effects were stronger in females, although sexual dichromatism was not significantly correlated with urban-tolerance. Our findings clearly show that species that are prone to live in urban environments differ in colour from those that avoid cities.
README: Global dataset of bird coloration and traits
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8jg
This dataset contains variables separated in two different Excel sheets: species level and assemblage level with the readme containing the information of the different variables in each file.
Description of the data and file structure
Variables and Description
phylo.name: scientific name matching taxonomy of www.birdtree.org
urban.slope: urban success index: slope of regression, log(Abundance+0.1)~urbanization level
urban.diff.maxmin: urban success index: log(Abundance at maximum level of urbanization +0.1) - log(Abundance at minimum level of urbanization +0.1) [Note that in this case the maximum or minimum levels of urbanization are not always 5 and 1 respectively]
urban.diff.12vs345: urban success index : mean(log(Abundance at level of urbanization 5 +0.1), log(Abundance at level of urbanization 4 +0.1), log(Abundance at level of urbanization 3 +0.1)) – mean(log(Abundance at level of urbanization 1 +0.1), log(Abundance at level of urbanization 2 +0.1))
urban.diff.123vs45: urban success index: mean(log(Abundance at level of urbanization 5 +0.1), log(Abundance at level of urbanization 4 +0.1)) – mean(log(Abundance at level of urbanization 1 +0.1), log(Abundance at level of urbanization 2 +0.1), log(Abundance at level of urbanization 3 +0.1))
urban.diff.1vs5:urban success index: log(Abundance at level of urbanization 5 +0.1) - log(Abundance at level of urbanization 1 +0.1) [In this case the maximum or minimum levels of urbanization are always 5 and 1 respectively]
region: name of city where urban tolerances were estimated
black_m: proportion of black plumage in males
black_f: proportion of black plumage in females
white_m: proportion of white plumage in males
white_f: proportion of white plumage in females
blue_m: proportion of blue plumage in males
blue_f: proportion of blue plumage in females
red_m: proportion of red plumage in males
red_f: proportion of red plumage in females
green_m: proportion of green plumage in males
green_f: proportion of green plumage in females
purple_m: proportion of purple plumage in males
purple_f: proportion of purple plumage in females
yellow_m: proportion of yellow plumage in males
yellow_f: proportion of yellow plumage in females
grey.dark_m: proportion of dark grey plumage in males
grey.dark_f: proportion of dark grey plumage in females
grey.light_m: proportion of light grey plumage in males
grey.light_f: proportion of light grey plumage in females
brown.dark_m: proportion of dark brown plumage in males
brown.dark_f: proportion of dark brown plumage in females
brown.light_m: proportion of light brown plumage in males
brown.light_f: proportion of light brown plumage in females
rufous_m: proportion of rufous plumage in males
rufous_f: proportion of rufous plumage in females
n.loci_m colour diversity: number of colour loci in males
n.loci_f colour diversity: number of colour loci in females
chull_m colour diversity: convex hull colour volume in males (volume in CIELAB colour space)
chull_f colour diversity: convex hull colour volume in females (volume in CIELAB colour space)
d.cen_m colour diversity: colour span in males (distance in CIELAB colour space)
d.cen_f colour diversity: colour span in females (distance in CIELAB colour space)
elaboration_m colour elaboration: vividness in males (distance in CIELAB colour space)
elaboration_f colour elaboration: vividness in females (distance in CIELAB colour space)
maleness.score_m colour elaboration: maleness score in males (%)
maleness.score_f colour elaboration: maleness score in females (%)
openness vegetation openness. Values ranging from 1 (closed habitat) to 4 (open habitat)
ground.nest binary, nests on ground yes=1, no=0
cav.rock.nest binary, nests in cavities or rocks yes=1, no=0
Diet.5Cat Diet categories: Frui/Nect, Omnivore, Invertebrate, VertFishScav, PlantSeed
ForStrat.ground proportion of time foraging on ground (%)
BodyMass.Value body mass (g)
territoriality degree of territoriality, 0=non territorial, 1=seasonal territorial, 2=year round territorial
sex.sel.m degree of social polygyny (values from 0 to 5 indicating the strength of social polygyny on males)
sex.sel.f degree of social polyandry (values from 0 to 5 indicating the strength of social polyandry on females)
maleness.dich sexual dichromatism in maleness (difference between maleness.score_m and maleness.score_f)
elab.dich sexual dichromatism in vividness (difference between elaboration_m and elaboration_f)
Assemblage level: the variables used for the analyses at the assemblage level
Missing values are indicated as NA
Variables and Description
region name of city where urban tolerances were estimated
urban.level level of urbanization from 1-5
n.sp number of species in each assemblage
chull convex hull volume of bird colours present in assemblage
n.loci number of colour loci of bird colours present in assemblage
d.cen distance to assemblage centroid of bird colours present in assemblage (distance in CIELAB colour space)