Detection of Khapra Beetle environmental DNA using portable technologies in Australian biosecurity
Cite this dataset
Trujillo-González, Alejandro et al. (2022). Detection of Khapra Beetle environmental DNA using portable technologies in Australian biosecurity [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jwstqjq96
Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts, 1898, is a serious pest of stored grain products globally. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based methods offer sensitive detection tools used to inform biosecurity officers on the presence of high-risk pests. This study tested laboratory and portable molecular technologies to detect khapra beetle environmental DNA extracted from dust samples collected during biosecurity responses (Tuggeranong and Fyshwick) to khapra beetle incursions in Australia. Airborne and floor dust samples were collected opportunistically using handheld vacuum cleaners and eDNA was extracted using either field or laboratory-based extraction methods and analyzed using laboratory benchtop real time PCR machines and portable machines with two TaqMan and one LAMP-based assay. We successfully collected, extracted, and amplified khapra beetle eDNA from dust samples by qPCR, but failed to amplify T. granarium eDNA using LAMP. The Laboratory qPCR machine showed significantly higher mean Ct values (p < 0.001) and significantly higher positive detections for both assays (p < 0.001) compared to the portable thermocycler. DNA yield was significantly higher in samples extracted using laboratory-based kits compared to field kits (p < 0.001) for both vacuumed and airborne samples (Mean DNA ± S.D. = 5.52 ± 4.45 and 4.77 ± 1.68 ng/μL, respectively), compared to field kits, (1.75 ± 1.17 and 1.36± 1.29 ng/μL for vacuumed and airborne samples, respectively). There were no significant differences in DNA yield between collection methods or differences in amplification associated to extraction or collection methods in either platform tested in this study. Portable technologies tested in this study (Franklin™ Real Time Thermocycler and Genie III) accurately amplified all tissue derived DNA during assay optimisation and field testing, highlighting the capacity of these technologies to complement biosecurity in confirming specimen ID. There was a high incidence of positive detections in field negative controls (Tuggeranong = 12.3 % and Fyshwick = 50 %), mostly attributed to the use of contaminated vacuum cleaners. We discuss suitable methods to minimize sample cross-contamination, the potential of portable molecular technologies as tools for biosecurity applications, and the suitability of eDNA-based molecular detection methods to complement global trade biosecurity for one of the most invasive and important grain pests worldwide.
This dataset contains amplification data for all environmental DNA samples collected during Australian biosecurity responses for Khapra beetle. All Samples were run in triplicate (including negative extraction blanks, field and negative controls) using TaqMan assays designed in previous studies. We considered samples as positive if amplification crossed a common threshold determined individually within each qPCR run and if detections occured within each assay's cutoff values. If no positive amplification was observed in any qPCR replicates then samples were deemed negative. Quantitative PCR reactions were done using the ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Vic., Australia) and in a Franklin™ portable Realtime Thermocycler (Biomeme, USA). All data associated to exporting/importing companies have been removed to ensure confidentiality.
Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Australian Government, Award: BIP 182020
Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Award: 182020