Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Dryness, wetness and temporary flooding reduce floral resources of plant communities with adverse consequences for pollinator attraction

Citation

Walter, Julia (2020), Dryness, wetness and temporary flooding reduce floral resources of plant communities with adverse consequences for pollinator attraction, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m905qftxf

Abstract

1. Climate change alters precipitation regimes worldwide and is regarded as a major threat for pollinators and pollination services. Yet, not much is known on how wetter as well as drier conditions affect food resources for pollinators and pollinator attraction in a multi-species community context. It is unclear how community shifts under changed hydrological conditions might affect pollinators. 2. This mesocosm study addresses existing research gaps by investigating effects of drought, wetness and temporary flooding on floral resources and pollinator attraction within a plant community, initially including nine insect- and six wind-pollinated species. Floral resources were assessed over three growing seasons monitoring community descriptors (percentage of herbs and herbaceous species richness, presence of flowering insect-pollinated individuals), floral traits (flower height, size and weight, floral sugar content of one key species) and proxies for plant fitness (pollinator attraction, seed and flower weight of one key species). 3. Wetness and especially dryness decreased the species richness and biomass proportion of insect-pollinated herbaceous species and flowering herbaceous plant individuals occurred less frequently. Permanent wetness decreased the floral sugar content of the key species Trifolium pratense. Consequently, wet, temporary flooded and especially dry communities were visited by pollinators less often, and active pollinators spent less time within wet and flooded communities, while not at all visiting dry communities. Seed and flower weight of the obligate xenogamous T. pratense in flooded and dry communities was decreased, indicating negative consequences for plant fitness caused by a lack of pollination. 4. Synthesis: While dryness had negative effects for floral resources when looking at both, community descriptors and floral traits, negative effects of wetness and temporary flooding were mostly caused by a decrease of insect-pollinated herbaceous species. The study thus indicates that shifts in plant community composition are decisive for a predictive understanding of plant-pollinator interactions under environmental change, but have been neglected in past research. Changing precipitation patterns will adversely affect floral resources and pollinator attraction in agriculturally used temperate grassland, which might have widespread negative consequences for pollination services and food security in coming decades.

Methods

Data was collected in a pot experiment with sown grassland communities, as described in the article.

 

Usage Notes

water= hydrological conditions under which plant communitis grew from 2016 until 2019    
L=waterlogged    
D=dry    
M=mesic
PL=temporary flooding

species: herbaceous plant species    

Am= Achillea millefolium    
Bp= Bellis perennis    
Cb= Crepis biennis    
Cj= Centaurea jacea    
Ga= Galium mollugo agg.    
Pl= Plantago lanceolata    
Td= Trifolium dubium    
Tp= Trifolium pratense    
Vc= Vicia cracca    

pot    pot number    

no. visitors    number of insects touching flowers of herbaceous species    
time spent    seconds that insect stayed on flowers of a certain pot    
time spent without rest    seconds without insects resting on flowers for more than 60 s    
visitor    kind of visitor: BB= bumblebee, B= bee, D=dipteran species (visitor 1-4; one pot was never visited by more than four pollinators, time [s] 1 refers to time visitor 1 spent in the pot (and so on)
flow    number of flowers touched by respective visitor    
species richness    number of different insect-pollinated species in community    
present    was plant species present in community (1=yes, 0=no)    
occurring in flowering state    did species flower in a given year (1=yes, 0=no)    
abundance [%]    abundance of herbaceous species in %, based on biomass production data (does not add up to 100, because graminoid species were present in communities as well)
biomass production [g]    total biomass production of one pot in grams    
herb weight    weight of herbaceous species from one pot    
grass weight    weight of graminoid species from one pot    
singly potted: results of floral traits for plants that grew singly in pots in 2018    

NA means that data were not available or could not be measured (e.g. no floral traits could be measured when flowering species was not present)

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Award: WA 3442/2-1