Data from: Landscape composition and life-history traits influence bat movement and space use: analysis of 30 years of published telemetry data
Data files
Dec 20, 2021 version files 1.15 MB
-
Laforge_IndivBatData.csv
1.06 MB
-
Laforge_MeanBatData.csv
98.32 KB
Abstract
Aim: Animal movement determines home range patterns, which in turn affect individual fitness, population dynamics and ecosystem functioning. Using temperate bats, a group of particular conservation concern, we investigated how morphological traits, habitat specialization and environmental variables affect home range sizes and daily foraging movements, using a compilation of 30 years of published bat telemetry data.
Location: Northern America and Europe.
Time period: 1988 – 2016.
Major taxa studied: Bats.
Methods: We compiled data on home range size and mean daily distance between roosts and foraging areas at both colony and individual levels from 166 studies of 3,129 radiotracked individuals of 49 bat species. We calculated multi-scale habitat composition and configuration in the surrounding landscapes of the 165 studied roosts. Using mixed models, we examined the effects of habitat availability and spatial arrangement on bat movements, while accounting for body mass, aspect ratio, wing loading and habitat specialization.
Results: We found a significant effect of landscape composition on home range size and mean daily distance at both colony and individual levels. On average, home ranges were up to 42% smaller in the most habitat-diversified landscapes while mean daily distances were up to 30% shorter in the most forested landscapes. Bat home range size significantly increased with body mass, wing aspect ratio and wing loading, and decreased with habitat specialization.
Main conclusions: Promoting bat movements through the landscape surrounding roosts at large spatial scales is crucial for bat conservation. Forest loss and overall landscape homogenization lead temperate bats to fly farther to meet their ecological requirements, by increasing home range sizes and daily foraging distances. Both processes might be more detrimental for smaller, habitat-specialized bats, less able to travel increasingly longer distances to meet their diverse needs.
Usage notes
Individual data includes the IDs of each individuals ('ID'), of each roost ('ID_site'), of each study ('ID_study'); the species name; the year of publication ('Year_publi') and the year of bat capture ('Year_capture'); the country where each study was conducted; the sex, age and reproductive status ('Status') of each individual; the scaled transmitter weight ('Trams_weight_sc'); the scaled number of fixes ('n_fixes_sc'); the scaled number of nights of survey ('n_nights_sc'); the log-transformed the size of home range ('LogMCP'); the log-transformed daily distance movement between roost and foraging areas ('LogDist'); the scaled Human FootPrint index ('HFP_sc'), the scaled road density ('Densroad_sc'), the scaled forest proportion ('Forest_sc'), the scaled Shannon diversity index ('Divshan_sc') and the scaled number of forest patches ('Forest_np_sc'), the five last landscape variables are calculated at four different scales: 1: 1km radii; 5: 5km radii; 10: 10km radii; 20: 20km radii. The data also includes four life-history traits: scaled body mass (g); scaled aspect ratio; scaled wing loading and the scaled species specialization index ('SSI_sc').
Mean data (colony level) includes the same variables (expect the sex, age and reproductive status) as for the individual data and the scaled number of individuals ('n_ind_sc') used to calculate the mean home range size and daily distance movement between the roost and the foraging areas.