Predatory arthropod community composition in apple orchards: Orchard management, landscape structure and sampling method
Cite this dataset
Hambäck, Peter; Porcel, Mario; Tasin, Marco; Samnegård, Ulrika (2021). Predatory arthropod community composition in apple orchards: Orchard management, landscape structure and sampling method [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.p8cz8w9n2
Studies on predatory arthropods in agricultural areas seldom include Diptera other than hover flies, partly because common sampling methods are less effective for capturing species that easily fly off when disturbed. To study the effect from this bias when describing the predator community, we compared traditional beat sampling of branches and suction sampling for describing the community of predatory arthropods in Swedish apple orchards, both organic orchards and orchards using integrated pest management. Our results indicate that the proportion of both predatory dipterans and parasitic hymenopterans increase dramatically when using suction sampling (Diptera: 32% vs 20%, Hymenoptera: 25% vs 7%). In fact, predatory dipterans were the most abundant predatory group when using suction sampling, in contrast to beat sampling where spiders were the most abundant group. One group of predatory flies that was particularly rich in both species and individuals in the surveyed apple orchards was dance flies in the family Hybotidae. Even though the bias of sampling method was evident, it was encouraging that the method choice did not affect the conclusions concerning management on predatory arthropod communities. With both methods, dipteran and coleopteran predators were more abundant in organic apple orchards whereas opilionids were more abundant in orchards managed according to integrated pest management. The inclusion of landscape variables further indicated effects of landscape diversity and of deciduous forest cover, but the response varied in sign between predatory groups. Whereas both Coleoptera and Heteroptera were more abundant in orchards surrounded by more complex landscapes (high landscape diversity and/or high deciduous forest cover), spiders, opilionids and dipterans were rather less abundant in these orchards. To conclude, our study points to the potential importance of predatory dipterans in apple orchards, and we highly recommend future studies of arthropod predators in apple and other crops to actively include predatory Diptera.
The data were collected in 28 apple orchards in S Sweden (14 organic and 14 IPM), using either beating sampling (in 2015) or suction sampling (in 2016). Landscape data were retrieved from the IACS data base within 1 km from the sampling point. Selected habitats (excluding roads and other human constructions) were then calculated as the proportion of the total area. Samples were only sorted to predatory group, except for Diptera that were identified to species.
'Data file Predatory Arthropods.xls' contains all environmental data, abundance data of broad predatory groups (Coleoptera, Aranae, Heteroptera, Hymenoptera, Neuroptera, Opiliones, Diptera, Dermaptera) and dipteran subgroups (Hybotidae, Dolichopodidae), and number of captured species of selected dipteran groups (Empididae, Hybotidae and Dolichopodidae). Diptera diversity is calculated as the pooled value of 2015 and 2016, using the combination of samling methods. Missing values indicated with NA.
Environmental data describe collection year (2015 = beat sampling, 2016 = suction sampling), orchard type (organic, IPM), site identity, 8 variables describing proportional cover of habitats within a 1 km radius (cereals, flowering crops, perennial crops, wetlands, conifers, broadleaved trees, seminatural grassland and gardens), a measure of landscape diversity (Shannon diversity of recorded landscape categories) and %flower cover within orchards.
Abundance data describe number of captured individuals per orchard. 2015: Beat sampling was conducted on 24 trees per orchard and one branch per tree. The trees were located along a 40 m linear transect from field edge towards field interior. The size of sampled branches was selected to be similar to the beating tray. The tray consisted on a 65 × 50 cm wooden frame with a handle supporting a quadrangular funnel-shaped cloth (50 cm high) sloping down towards the center to a cup containing 70 % ethanol. 2016: Suction sampling was conducted using the InsectaZooka suction sampling device (Bioquip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA) for 10x2 minutes per orchard. During each 2 minute sampling, we collected insects in a short stocking placed at the inlet (diameter 6 cm) of the suction sampling device and each sample contained arthropods from branches on 2-3 neighboring apple trees depending on apple tree size. Thus, the total number of sampled trees was similar between beat and suction sampling. At the end of each 2 minute sampling, the stocking was removed, sealed and placed in a cool box for transportation.
'Dipteran community data.xls' contains all data on dipteran abundance at the species level.
BiodivERsA - FACCE, Award: 2014-74
Swedish Research Council for Environment Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, Award: 2014-1784
BiodivERsA - FACCE, Award: 2014-74